פראאדם/'An Onager Man' (Gen 16:12α) as a Metaphor of Social Oppression.

This essay focuses on the presentation of Ishmael as an 'onager man' in Gen 16:12α and shows that conventional readings of Ishmael's profile are wrong about the direction in which aggression is channelled in his material-he is not the aggressor, he is on the receiving end of aggression. It argues th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Vetus Testamentum Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 16 - 42
Autor principal: Kozlova, Ekaterina E.
Formato: Essay
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=120975608&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 120975608
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00424935
        C6B
      jtl: Vetus Testamentum
      issn: 00424935
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2017
      vid: 67
      iid: 1
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        120975608
        10.1163/15685330-12341271
      ppf: 16
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: פראאדם/'An Onager Man' (Gen 16:12α) as a Metaphor of Social Oppression.
      aug:
        au: Kozlova, Ekaterina E.
        affil: University of Oxford, UK
      su:
        Ishmael (Biblical figure)
        Abraham (Biblical patriarch)
        Oppression
        Metaphor in the Bible
        Onager
      sug:
        subj:
          Ishmael (Biblical figure)
          Abraham (Biblical patriarch)
          Oppression
          Metaphor in the Bible
          Onager
      keyword:
        Abraham
        Ishmael
        onager man
        social oppression
      ab: This essay focuses on the presentation of Ishmael as an 'onager man' in Gen 16:12α and shows that conventional readings of Ishmael's profile are wrong about the direction in which aggression is channelled in his material-he is not the aggressor, he is on the receiving end of aggression. It argues that the first statement in the oracle in Gen 16:12α receives its resolution in the act of Abraham's banishment of Ishmael in Gen 21. This reading is predicated on the fact that animalisation was a widely-used cultural tool of mediating violence (political, economic, and social) with onagers representing a lowest register of the abused and disadvantaged segments of ancient societies (cf. Job 24, 30; Sir 13). In addition, it shows that animals, equids in particular, are featured in contexts of socially unacceptable types of interments, and Ishmael's designation as an onager points to his disinheritance and 'non-burial' in Gen 21.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Essay
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Vetus Testamentum is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Vetus Testamentum
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N