A RESPONSE TO GILLMORE AND STALLINGS REGARDING A PAPER BY NEDLER AND SEBERA (1971).
Gillmore and Stallings criticize Nedler and Sebera's paper in terms of the experimental design, statistical analysis, and data errors in the report. I am responding because responsibility for the research design and analysis of the project in question was mine. To provide some context: Mrs. Nedler w...
| Publicado en: | Child Development Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 1039 - 1041 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Sep1972
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=12114642&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 12114642 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00093920 CDV jtl: Child Development issn: 00093920 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep1972 vid: 43 iid: 3 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 12114642 10.2307/1127654 ppf: 1039 ppct: 2 formats: tig: atl: A RESPONSE TO GILLMORE AND STALLINGS REGARDING A PAPER BY NEDLER AND SEBERA (1971). aug: au: Randall, Robert S. affil: Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory. su: Psychological research Child development Experimental design Research methodology Early childhood education Teachers sug: subj: Psychological research Child development Experimental design Research methodology Early childhood education Teachers ab: Gillmore and Stallings criticize Nedler and Sebera's paper in terms of the experimental design, statistical analysis, and data errors in the report. I am responding because responsibility for the research design and analysis of the project in question was mine. To provide some context: Mrs. Nedler was responsible for developing the Early Childhood program reported on in the paper. She was assisted by a staff of about 12 professionals, including three teachers. Mrs. Sebera's responsibility was for testing and other data-gathering functions called for in an evaluation design developed by the Research and Evaluation Division, Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory (SEDL), which I directed. That R&E staff included about 25 professionals, four of whom were statisticians. In October 1962 the R&E division published a complete evaluation report, wherein the project was described and results were reported. Neither Mrs. Nedler nor Mrs. Sebera has responsibility for the evaluation design, analysis, or report, although both were involved. However, Nedler and Sebera (hereafter, N & S) based the article in question on their own experiences and knowledge of the evaluation design and analysis described in the October 1969 report. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1972 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|