IS THE METHODOLOGICAL REVOLUTION IN PSYCHOLOGY OVER OR JUST BEGINNING?
Significant results from parapsychological experiments using standard psychological research methods motivated psychologists to recognize some widespread methodological deficiencies and the need for preregistered well-powered confirmatory research. Psychological researchers have not yet recognized s...
| Published in: | Journal of Parapsychology Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 156 - 169 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Rhine Research Center
Fall2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=121172901&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 121172901 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00223387 PAY jtl: Journal of Parapsychology issn: 00223387 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2016 vid: 80 iid: 2 pid: 533 pub: Rhine Research Center artinfo: ui: 121172901 ppf: 156 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.1MB tig: atl: IS THE METHODOLOGICAL REVOLUTION IN PSYCHOLOGY OVER OR JUST BEGINNING? aug: au: Kennedy, J. E. su: Parapsychology Confirmation bias Confirmatory factor analysis Psychological research Research methodology sug: subj: Parapsychology Confirmation bias Confirmatory factor analysis Psychological research Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities Research methodology keyword: experimenter fraud incomplete data research methodology software validation statistical power experimenter fraud incomplete data research methodology software validation statistical power ab: Significant results from parapsychological experiments using standard psychological research methods motivated psychologists to recognize some widespread methodological deficiencies and the need for preregistered well-powered confirmatory research. Psychological researchers have not yet recognized several other common methodological weaknesses that can be expected to cause this cycle to be repeated. When confronted with the choice between psi versus overlooked methodological deficiencies, psychologists will recognize the need for methodological improvements. These overlooked methodological factors include: (a) deficient study registration practices, (b) bias from dropouts and incomplete data, (c) the need for software validation, (d) measures to prevent experimenter fraud, (e) appropriate statistical methods for confirmatory research, (f) failure to consider inferential errors with Bayesian analyses, (g) the weaknesses of retrospective meta-analysis and strengths of prospective meta-analysis, and (h) problems from statistical dependence for the outcome variables in statistical analyses. Psychological and parapsychological researchers can easily avoid this inefficient process of methodological evolution driven by controversies about parapsychological findings. Research practices that address these methodological deficiencies are available and will eventually be recognized as needed for psychological and parapsychological research. Recommended practices for addressing these methodological weaknesses are described. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|