Accuracy of an automated transthoracic echocardiographic tool for 3D assessment of left heart chamber volumes.

Aims The feasibility and accuracy of an automated adaptive algorithm (Heart Model) for the quantification of left heart chamber volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction has been reported earlier. An improved version of the algorithm is available, and we aimed to test its accuracy compared with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Echocardiography Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 199 - 210
Autores principales: Spitzer, Ernest, Ren, Ben, Soliman, Osama I. I., Zijlstra, Felix, Van Mieghem, Nicolas M., Geleijnse, Marcel L.
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=121443900&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 121443900
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07422822
        GSE
      jtl: Echocardiography
      issn: 07422822
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2017
      vid: 34
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        121443900
        121443900
        121443900
        10.1111/echo.13436
        121443900
      ppf: 199
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Accuracy of an automated transthoracic echocardiographic tool for 3D assessment of left heart chamber volumes.
      aug:
        au:
          Spitzer, Ernest
          Ren, Ben
          Soliman, Osama I. I.
          Zijlstra, Felix
          Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
          Geleijnse, Marcel L.
        affil: Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms Evaluation
          Heart Ventricle, Left Ultrasonography
          Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
          Heart Atrium, Left Ultrasonography
          Validity
          Ventricular Ejection Fraction
          Descriptive Statistics
          Human
          Observer Bias
          Software
          Stroke Volume
          Ventricular Function, Left
          Interrater Reliability
          Intrarater Reliability
          Male
          Female
          Aged
          Middle Age
          Adult
          T-Tests
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Data Analysis Software
          P-Value
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Automation
          Diastole
          Academic Medical Centers
          Netherlands
          Confidence Intervals
          Systole
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Aims The feasibility and accuracy of an automated adaptive algorithm (Heart Model) for the quantification of left heart chamber volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction has been reported earlier. An improved version of the algorithm is available, and we aimed to test its accuracy compared with manual 3D echocardiography. Methods and Results Apical 3D transthoracic datasets were obtained in 67 patients. Acquisitions covering ventricles and atria were performed for analysis using the automated software (Heart Model, Philips Healthcare). In addition, acquisitions focused on the left ventricle were acquired for left ventricle manual 3D measurements ( QLAB 10 3 DQA, Philips Healthcare). Automated results using endocardial contouring settings at 50% showed a strong correlation with manual 3D measurements ( r=.84-.97). Left ventricular end-diastolic volumes were underestimated (bias −5.9 mL, LOA ±38.5 mL), with no significant differences in other parameters. Intra-observer variability using the automated algorithm was zero for all parameters given the lack of human interaction. Manual corrections of the automatic algorithm introduced small but significant differences in volumes but not in ejection fraction when compared with automatic results. Manually corrected results of the automatic algorithm were not significantly different from those obtained with manual 3D echocardiography, except for a small underestimation of left atrial volumes (bias −2.1 mL, LOA ±15.2 mL). Conclusions The current improved version of the automated adaptive algorithm is accurate for the assessment of left heart chamber volumes, albeit a small underestimation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is seen, when compared with manual 3D echocardiography.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N