Daily Goals Formulation and Enhanced Visualization of Mechanical Ventilation Variance Improves Mechanical Ventilation Score.

BACKGROUND: The systematic implementation of evidence-based practice through the use of guidelines, checklists, and protocols mitigates the risks associated with mechanical ventilation, yet variation in practice remains prevalent. Recent advances in software and hardware have allowed for the develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 268 - 279
Autores principales: Walsh, Brian K., Smallwood, Craig, Rettig, Jordan, Kacmarek, Robert M., Thompson, John, Arnold, John H.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Mar2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=121560493&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 121560493
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2017
      vid: 62
      iid: 3
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        121560493
        121560493
        121560493
        10.4187/respcare.04873
        121560493
      ppf: 268
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Daily Goals Formulation and Enhanced Visualization of Mechanical Ventilation Variance Improves Mechanical Ventilation Score.
      aug:
        au:
          Walsh, Brian K.
          Smallwood, Craig
          Rettig, Jordan
          Kacmarek, Robert M.
          Thompson, John
          Arnold, John H.
        affil: Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicne, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
      sug:
        subj:
          Goals and Objectives
          Respiration, Artificial
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Technology Evaluation
          Critical Care
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Treatment Outcomes
          Child, Preschool
          Data Analysis
          Monitoring, Physiologic
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          P-Value
          Data Analysis Software
          Child
          Adolescence
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
      ab: BACKGROUND: The systematic implementation of evidence-based practice through the use of guidelines, checklists, and protocols mitigates the risks associated with mechanical ventilation, yet variation in practice remains prevalent. Recent advances in software and hardware have allowed for the development and deployment of an enhanced visualization tool that identifies mechanical ventilation goal variance. Our aim was to assess the utility of daily goal establishment and a computer-aided visualization of variance. METHODS: This study was composed of 3 phases: a retrospective observational phase (baseline) followed by 2 prospective sequential interventions. Phase I intervention comprised daily goal establishment of mechanical ventilation. Phase II intervention was the setting and monitoring of daily goals of mechanical ventilation with a web-based data visualization system (T3). A single score of mechanical ventilation was developed to evaluate the outcome. RESULTS: The baseline phase evaluated 130 subjects, phase I enrolled 31 subjects, and phase II enrolled 36 subjects. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between cohorts. A total of 171 verbalizations of goals of mechanical ventilation were completed in phase I. The use of T3 increased by 87% from phase I. Mechanical ventilation score improved by 8.4% in phase I and 11.3% in phase II from baseline (P = .032). The largest effect was in the low risk VT category, with a 40.3% improvement from baseline in phase I, which was maintained at 39% improvement from baseline in phase II (P = .01). mechanical ventilation score was 9% higher on average in those who survived. CONCLUSIONS: Daily goal formation and computer-enhanced visualization of mechanical ventilation variance were associated with an improvement in goal attainment by evidence of an improved mechanical ventilation score. Further research is needed to determine whether improvements in mechanical ventilation score through a targeted, process-oriented intervention will lead to improved patient outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02184208.)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N