Back to the Unchanging Past.
The standard philosophical view of time travel has it that time travelers cannot change the past. It has been argued by some that the standard view is false, and that this can be shown using a two-dimensional model of time. I defend the standard view against this attack. I show, first, that the addi...
| Publicado en: | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 98; no. 1; pp. 129 - 148 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Mar2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=121625486&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 121625486 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02790750 PHZ jtl: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly issn: 02790750 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2017 vid: 98 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 121625486 10.1111/papq.12127 ppf: 129 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 246KB tig: atl: Back to the Unchanging Past. aug: au: Baron, Sam affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Western Australia su: Time travel Imaginary voyages Spacetime Travelers Historical distance sug: subj: Time travel Imaginary voyages Spacetime Travelers Historical distance ab: The standard philosophical view of time travel has it that time travelers cannot change the past. It has been argued by some that the standard view is false, and that this can be shown using a two-dimensional model of time. I defend the standard view against this attack. I show, first, that the addition of a second temporal dimension does not provide a model of changing the past and, second, that neither does the addition of n temporal dimensions for any n > 1. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|