Early maladaptive schemas, behavioral inhibition/approach systems, and defense styles in the users of natural and synthetic substances and healthy subjects.

Factors contributing to abusing various substances may be different. The aim of the present study was to study the comparison of early maladaptive schemas (EMSs), behavioral inhibition system (BIS)/behavioral approach system (BAS), and defense styles among Iranian natural and synthetic substance use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Substance Use Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 168 - 176
Autores principales: Khosravani, Vahid, Alvani, Amin, Seidisarouei, Mohammad, Amirinezhad, Ali, Shojaee, Davod
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=121663661&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 121663661
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14659891
        ILV
      jtl: Journal of Substance Use
      issn: 14659891
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2017
      vid: 22
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        121663661
        121663661
        121663661
        10.3109/14659891.2016.1166272
        121663661
      ppf: 168
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Early maladaptive schemas, behavioral inhibition/approach systems, and defense styles in the users of natural and synthetic substances and healthy subjects.
      aug:
        au:
          Khosravani, Vahid
          Alvani, Amin
          Seidisarouei, Mohammad
          Amirinezhad, Ali
          Shojaee, Davod
        affil: Prevention of Psychosocial Injuries Research Centre, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
      sug:
        subj:
          Persons with Substance Use Disorders Psychosocial Factors
          Designer Drugs Adverse Effects
          Defense Mechanisms Drug Effects
          Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms Drug Effects
          Human
          Iran
          Adaptation, Psychological Drug Effects
          Street Drugs Adverse Effects
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Self Report
          Questionnaires
          Descriptive Statistics
          Multivariate Analysis of Variance
          Data Analysis Software
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Social Behavior Disorders Psychosocial Factors
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Factors contributing to abusing various substances may be different. The aim of the present study was to study the comparison of early maladaptive schemas (EMSs), behavioral inhibition system (BIS)/behavioral approach system (BAS), and defense styles among Iranian natural and synthetic substance users at the start of their treatment and healthy subjects in Shiraz, Iran, since July 2014 to September 2015. In a cross-sectional comparative design, 1056 participants including 704 users of natural (n= 352) and synthetic (n= 352) substances (meanage= 29) and healthy subjects (n= 352, meanage= 29) were selected and they completed the demographic questionnaire, Young Maladaptive Schemas Questionnaire-Short Form, Carver & White BIS/BAS scale, and Defense Style Questionnaire. Results revealed that there were significant differences between the natural and synthetic substance users with healthy subjects in EMSs, BIS, BAS subscales, and defense styles. Also, the users of natural substances showed higher means in EMSs, BIS, and immature defense style, while the synthetic substance users earned higher scores on BAS subscales and neurotic defense style, and healthy subjects gained higher scores on mature defense style than natural and synthetic substances. We concluded that there were significant differences among two groups in EMSs, BIS, BAS subscales, and defense styles.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N