“What Have Animals to Do With Social Work?” A Sociological Reflection on Species and Social Work.
The contributors to Thomas Ryan’s Animals in Social Work offer a challenge to anthropocentrism in social work theory and practice. Because this challenge resonates with the “zoological connection” that confronts anthropocentric sociology, this review article offers a sociological examination of key...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Animal Ethics Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 96 - 109 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Illinois Press
Spring2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=121748027&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 121748027 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 21565414 BFVH jtl: Journal of Animal Ethics issn: 21565414 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2017 vid: 7 iid: 1 pid: 416 pub: University of Illinois Press artinfo: ui: 121748027 10.5406/janimalethics.7.1.0096 ppf: 96 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 579KB tig: atl: “What Have Animals to Do With Social Work?” A Sociological Reflection on Species and Social Work. aug: au: PEGGS, KAY affil: Kingston University, England. su: Animal welfare Ryan, Thomas sug: subj: Animal welfare Ryan, Thomas keyword: animals anthropocentrism ethics personhood property selfhood social work sociology welfare ab: The contributors to Thomas Ryan’s Animals in Social Work offer a challenge to anthropocentrism in social work theory and practice. Because this challenge resonates with the “zoological connection” that confronts anthropocentric sociology, this review article offers a sociological examination of key points raised. In focusing on conceptualizations of the human animal binary, personhood and selfhood, property, ethics, and welfare, this article concludes that nonhuman animals ought to matter to social work. Ryan is right: One day social workers will be incredulous that social work could have overlooked nonhuman animals for so long. Sociologists will be similarly incredulous about anthropocentric sociology. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Animal Ethics is the property of University of Illinois Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Animal Ethics holder: University of Illinois Press dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|