Who is a 'healthy subject'?-consensus results on pivotal eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

Introduction/Methods : A discussion forum was hosted by the German not-for-profit Association for Applied Human Pharmacology (AGAH e.V.) to critically review key eligibility criteria and stopping rules for clinical trials with healthy subjects, enrolling stakeholders from the pharmaceutical industry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 409 - 417
Autores principales: Breithaupt-Groegler, Kerstin, Coch, Christoph, Coenen, Martin, Donath, Frank, Erb-Zohar, Katharina, Francke, Klaus, Goehler, Karin, Iovino, Mario, Kammerer, Klaus, Mikus, Gerd, Rengelshausen, Jens, Sourgens, Hildegard, Schinzel, Reinhard, Sudhop, Thomas, Wensing, Georg
Formato: review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=121806666&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 121806666
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00316970
        NP9
      jtl: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
      issn: 00316970
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2017
      vid: 73
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        121806666
        121806666
        143935863
        121806666
        10.1007/s00228-016-2189-8
        121806666
      ppf: 409
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Who is a 'healthy subject'?-consensus results on pivotal eligibility criteria for clinical trials.
      aug:
        au:
          Breithaupt-Groegler, Kerstin
          Coch, Christoph
          Coenen, Martin
          Donath, Frank
          Erb-Zohar, Katharina
          Francke, Klaus
          Goehler, Karin
          Iovino, Mario
          Kammerer, Klaus
          Mikus, Gerd
          Rengelshausen, Jens
          Sourgens, Hildegard
          Schinzel, Reinhard
          Sudhop, Thomas
          Wensing, Georg
        affil: -kbr- clinical pharmacology services , D-60431 Frankfurt am Main Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Consensus
          Research Subject Recruitment
          Health Status
          Clinical Trials
          Eligibility Determination
          Congresses and Conferences Germany
          Alanine Aminotransferase Blood
          Aspartate Aminotransferase Blood
          Pulse
          Drugs, Investigational
          Pharmacy and Pharmacology Organizations
          Germany
      ab: Introduction/Methods : A discussion forum was hosted by the German not-for-profit Association for Applied Human Pharmacology (AGAH e.V.) to critically review key eligibility criteria and stopping rules for clinical trials with healthy subjects, enrolling stakeholders from the pharmaceutical industry, contract research organisations, academia, ethics committees and competent authority. Results : Pivotal eligibility criteria were defined for trials with new investigational medicinal products (IMPs) or with clinically established IMPs. In general, a pulse rate ranging between 50 and 90 beats/min is recommended for first-in-human (FIH) trials, while wider ranges seem acceptable for trials with clinically established IMPs, provided there are no indications of thyroid dysfunction. Hepatic laboratory parameters not to exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) comprise ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and AST (aspartate aminotransferase) in FIH trials, whereas slight elevations (10% above ULN) seem acceptable in trials with clinically established IMPs without known hepatotoxicity. A normal renal function is required for any clinical trial in healthy subjects. A risk-adapted approach for stopping rules was adopted. Stopping rules for an individual subject are one adverse event of severe intensity or one serious adverse event. In case of a severe adverse event, some stakeholders demand a causal relationship with the IMP (i.e. an adverse reaction). Stopping rules for a cohort are one serious adverse reaction or ≥50% of subjects experiencing any adverse reaction of moderate or severe intensity. Consequences : The application of this consensus resulted in a reduction in protocol deficiencies issued by the competent authority.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N