MODELS, MYSTERY, AND PARADOX IN IAN RAMSEY.

One way of investigating the functions of theological doctrines is to compare them with scientific theories as ways of interpreting experience. Ian Ramsey has treated a number of themes relevant to this comparison, including the use of models in science and theology and the role of paradox in the la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell) Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 41 - 56
Autor principal: Austin, William H.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Spring68
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=12194283&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 12194283
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00218294
        SSN
      jtl: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell)
      issn: 00218294
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring68
      vid: 7
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        12194283
        10.2307/1385109
      ppf: 41
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: MODELS, MYSTERY, AND PARADOX IN IAN RAMSEY.
      aug:
        au: Austin, William H.
        affil: Department Philosophy, Rice University.
      su:
        Theology
        Science
        Paradox
        Social theory
        Religion
        Scientific knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Theology
          Science
          Paradox
          Social theory
          Religion
          Scientific knowledge
      ab: One way of investigating the functions of theological doctrines is to compare them with scientific theories as ways of interpreting experience. Ian Ramsey has treated a number of themes relevant to this comparison, including the use of models in science and theology and the role of paradox in the latter. Ramsey holds that paradoxes are to be dissolved by tracing them back to distinct models, each revealed in and justified by "disclosure." It is here argued that this interpretation is inadequate when the experience-interpreting function of theology is considered, but can consistently be supplemented with an interpretation which treats paradoxes as based on models which are complementary in the wave-particle sense.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1968
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N