From .wav to .txt: why we still need transcripts in the digital age.

Oral historians have debated whether and how to transcribe their interviews since the 1960s. New digital tools for indexing audio and video files appear to provide a powerful and exciting alternative to transcription. Despite such challenges, however, transcription continues to serve important purpo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Oral History (01430955) Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 33 - 43
Autor principal: Freund, Alexander
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oral History Society Spring2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=122001375&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 122001375
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01430955
        AZ9
      jtl: Oral History (01430955)
      issn: 01430955
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2017
      vid: 45
      iid: 1
      pid: 21565
      pub: Oral History Society
    artinfo:
      ui: 122001375
      ppf: 33
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: From .wav to .txt: why we still need transcripts in the digital age.
      aug:
        au: Freund, Alexander
      su:
        Oral historians
        Digitization
        Archives
      sug:
        subj:
          Oral historians
          Digitization
          Archives
      keyword:
        archives
        digitisation
        interview
        transcript
      ab: Oral historians have debated whether and how to transcribe their interviews since the 1960s. New digital tools for indexing audio and video files appear to provide a powerful and exciting alternative to transcription. Despite such challenges, however, transcription continues to serve important purposes of long-term preservation, analysis and dissemination. After surveying the transcription controversy over the past half-century, I outline five arguments in favour of transcription. I argue that archiving transcripts is a political act that places our oral histories on equal footing with governmentgenerated documents in state-run archives.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N