Forum Debate on Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen's Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography.

Is narrativism dead or still alive? Have all questions occasioned by the historical text been answered, so that philosophers of history must now turn to other problems? Or did narrativist philosophy of history have its blind spots that now demand their scrutiny? And if the historical text still has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the Philosophy of History Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Autor principal: Ankersmit, Frank
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=122227705&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 122227705
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1872261X
        2SGR
      jtl: Journal of the Philosophy of History
      issn: 1872261X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2017
      vid: 11
      iid: 1
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        122227705
        10.1163/18722636-12341360
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 324KB
      tig:
        atl: Forum Debate on Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen's Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography.
      aug:
        au: Ankersmit, Frank
        affil: University of Groningen
      su:
        Philosophy & history
        Argument
        Pragmatism
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophy & history
          Argument
          Pragmatism
      keyword:
        (post-)narrativism
        argument
        Kuukkanen
        pragmatism
      ab: Is narrativism dead or still alive? Have all questions occasioned by the historical text been answered, so that philosophers of history must now turn to other problems? Or did narrativist philosophy of history have its blind spots that now demand their scrutiny? And if the historical text still has its secrets and mysteries, is narrativism capable of dealing with them? Or would we need for this a 'postnarrativist' approach? And, if so, what will this new approach look like and what can we expect from it? These are the questions put on the agenda by Kukkanen's Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography (2015). In this forum debate five scholars (Brian Fay, Eugen Zelenak, Anton Froeyman, Frank Ankersmit and Daniel Fairbrother) comment on Kuukkanen's book. Pragmatism proves to be an important clue to their findings.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of the Philosophy of History is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of the Philosophy of History
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N