Dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin: A comparative study.
The notion of dialogue is foundational for both Juri Lotman and Mikhail Bakhtin. It is also central in Charles S. Peirce's semeiotics and logic. While there are several scholarly comparisons of Bakhtin's and Lotman's dialogisms, these have yet to be compared with Peirce's semeiotic dialogues. This a...
| Publicado en: | Sign Systems Studies Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 469 - 494 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Tartu
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=122572013&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 122572013 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14064243 DSW jtl: Sign Systems Studies issn: 14064243 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2016 vid: 44 iid: 4 pid: 25096 pub: University of Tartu artinfo: ui: 122572013 10.12697/SSS.2016.44.4.01 ppf: 469 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.8MB tig: atl: Dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin: A comparative study. aug: au: Laas, Oliver affil: School of Humanities, Tallinn University Narva mnt 25, 10120, Tallinn, Estonia The Chair of Graphic Art, Faculty of Fine Arts Estonian Academy of Art, Lembitu 12, 10114, Tallinn, Estonia su: Dialogism (Literary analysis) Dialogue Semiotics Game theory Lotman, Juri Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 Bakhtin, M. M. (Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich), 1895-1975 sug: subj: Dialogism (Literary analysis) Dialogue Semiotics Game theory Lotman, Juri Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 Bakhtin, M. M. (Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich), 1895-1975 keyword: dialogism dialogue game theory games logic semiosphere semiotics ab: The notion of dialogue is foundational for both Juri Lotman and Mikhail Bakhtin. It is also central in Charles S. Peirce's semeiotics and logic. While there are several scholarly comparisons of Bakhtin's and Lotman's dialogisms, these have yet to be compared with Peirce's semeiotic dialogues. This article takes tentative steps toward a comparative study of dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin. Peirce's understanding of dialogue is explicated, and compared with both Lotman's as well as Bakhtin's conceptions. Lotman saw dialogue as the basic meaning-making mechanism in the semio sphere. The benefits and shortcomings of reconceptualizing the semiosphere on the basis of Peircean and Bakhtinian dialogues are weighed. The aim is to explore methodological alternatives in semiotics, not to challenge Lotman's initial model. It is claimed that the semiosphere qua model operating with Bakhtinian dialogues is narrower in scope than Lotman's original conception, while the semiosphere qua model operating with Peircean dialogues appears to be broader in scope. It is concluded that the choice between alternative dialogical foundations must be informed by attentiveness to their differences, and should be motivated by the researcher's goals and theoretical commitments. Dialoogi mõiste on alustrajava tähtsusega nii Juri Lotmani kui ka Mihhail Bahtini puhul, samuti on see kesksel kohal Charles S. Peirce'i semiootikas ja loogikas. Ehkki Bahtini ja Lotmani dialogismi on mitmel korral teaduslikult võrreldud, on need ikka veel kõrvutamata Peirce'i semiootiliste dialoogidega. Käesolevas artiklis astutakse samm Peirce'i, Lotmani ja Bahtini dialoogilisuse võrdleva uurimise suunas. Selgitatakse, kuidas Peirce mõistis dialoogi, ning kõrvutatakse seda nii Lotmani kui ka Bahtini arusaamadega. Lotman pidas dialoogi peamiseks tähendusloome mehhanismiks semiosfääris. Kaalutakse eeliseid ja puudusi, mis on semiosfääri rekontseptualiseerimisel Peirce'i ja Bahtini dialoogidest lähtudes. Väidetakse, et bahtinlike dialoogidega töötava mudelina on semiosfäär vähem ulatusliku haardega kui Lotmani algne kontseptsioon, samas kui Peirce'i dialoogidega töötava mudelina on semiosfääri ulatus avaram. Eemärgiks on uurida metodoloogilisi alternative semiootikas, mitte vastanduda Lotmani esialgsele mudelile. Järeldatakse, et valikut alternatiivsete dialoogiliste aluste vahel peab suunama tähelepanelikkus nende erinevuste suhtes ning seda peaksid motiveerima uurija eesmärgid ning teoreetilised seisukohad. Понятие диалога - основополагающее как для Юрия Лотмана, так и для Михаила Бах-тина. Это также центральное понятие в семиотике и логике Чарльза С. Пирса. Имеются несколько академических работ, где сравнивается диалогизм у Лотмана и Бахтина, но до сих пор не проводилось сравнение их с семиотическими диалогами Пирса. Настоящая статья делает предварительные шаги к сравнительному исследо ванию диалогичности у Пирса, Лотмана и Бахтина. Лотман рассматривал диалог как основной смыслопорождающий механизм семиосферы. В статье утверждается, что семиосфера в качестве модели, работающей с диалогами Бахтина, является более узкой по объему, чем в оригинальной концепции Лотмана, в то время как модель семио сферы, работающая с диалогами Пирса, шире, чем у Лотмана. Нашей целью является исследование методологических альтернатив в семиотике, а не оспаривание первоначальной модели Лотмана. Главный вывод - выбор между альтернативными диалогическими основами должен направить внимание на их различия и должен быть мотивирован целями и теоретическими положениями исследователя. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Sign Systems Studies is the property of University of Tartu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Sign Systems Studies holder: University of Tartu dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|