The Greeks and the Romans: Translatio, Translation, and Parody in the Libro de buen amor.

The author discusses the story "The Disputation between the Greeks and the Romans" in the book "Libro de buen amor" which portrays the Libro and its author as parodies of authority. Topics covered include the critiques on the common Disputation-Libro obsession with hermeneutics and Augustinian sign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philological Quarterly Vol. 95; no. 3/4; pp. 323 - 342
Autor principal: FRANCOMANO, EMILY C.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Department of English, University of Iowa Summer/Fall2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=122614409&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 122614409
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00317977
        PLQ
      jtl: Philological Quarterly
      issn: 00317977
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer/Fall2016
      vid: 95
      iid: 3/4
      pid: 44733
      pub: Department of English, University of Iowa
    artinfo:
      ui: 122614409
      ppf: 323
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 829KB
      tig:
        atl: The Greeks and the Romans: Translatio, Translation, and Parody in the Libro de buen amor.
      aug:
        au: FRANCOMANO, EMILY C.
        affil: Georgetown University
      su:
        Libro de buen Amor (Book)
        Greeks
        Romans
        Parody
        Authors
      sug:
        subj:
          Libro de buen Amor (Book)
          Greeks
          Romans
          Parody
          Authors
      ab: The author discusses the story "The Disputation between the Greeks and the Romans" in the book "Libro de buen amor" which portrays the Libro and its author as parodies of authority. Topics covered include the critiques on the common Disputation-Libro obsession with hermeneutics and Augustinian sign theory, and scholars' proposals of varied origins for the episode. The author argues that their rereadings inform sign theory translation into fiction and narrate Latin authority in the vernacular.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philological Quarterly is the property of Department of English, University of Iowa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philological Quarterly
      holder: Department of English, University of Iowa
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N