In Defense of Strong AI: Semantics as Second-Order Rules.
This paper argues against John Searle in defense of the potential for computers to understand language ("Strong AI") by showing that semantic meaning is itself a second-order system of rules that connects symbols and syntax with extralinguistic facts. Searle's Chinese Room Argument is contested on t...
| Publicado en: | Stance (1943-1880) Vol. 10; pp. 38 - 44 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Ball State Innovation Corporation
Apr2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=122688513&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 122688513 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 19431880 B0S4 jtl: Stance (1943-1880) issn: 19431880 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2017 vid: 10 pid: 64501 pub: Ball State Innovation Corporation artinfo: ui: 122688513 ppf: 38 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 590KB tig: atl: In Defense of Strong AI: Semantics as Second-Order Rules. aug: au: Baron, Corey affil: Senior at Colorado College in Colorado Springs, Colorado su: Semantics Searle, John R., 1932-2025 Language & languages sug: subj: Semantics Searle, John R., 1932-2025 Language & languages ab: This paper argues against John Searle in defense of the potential for computers to understand language ("Strong AI") by showing that semantic meaning is itself a second-order system of rules that connects symbols and syntax with extralinguistic facts. Searle's Chinese Room Argument is contested on theoretical and practical grounds by identifying two problems in the thought experiment, and evidence about "machine learning" is used to demonstrate that computers are already capable of learning to form true observation sentences in the same way humans do. Finally, sarcasm is used as an example to extend the argument to more complex uses of language. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Stance (1943-1880) is the property of Ball State Innovation Corporation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Stance (1943-1880) holder: Ball State Innovation Corporation dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|