Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Organisations are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of employees in gaining and maintaining competitive advantage. The happy worker–productive worker thesis suggests that workers who experience high levels of well-being also perform well and vice versa; however, organisations need to kno...
| Publicado en: | Work & Stress Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 101 - 121 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jun2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=122715144&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 122715144 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02678373 BE8 jtl: Work & Stress issn: 02678373 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2017 vid: 31 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 122715144 122715144 122715144 10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463 122715144 ppf: 101 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. aug: au: Nielsen, Karina Nielsen, Morten B. Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere Känsälä, Marja Saari, Eveliina Isaksson, Kerstin affil: Sheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK sug: subj: Work Environment Psychosocial Factors Psychological Well-Being Job Performance Productivity Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis ab: Organisations are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of employees in gaining and maintaining competitive advantage. The happy worker–productive worker thesis suggests that workers who experience high levels of well-being also perform well and vice versa; however, organisations need to know how to ensure such happy and productive workers. The present review and meta-analysis identifies workplace resources at the individual, the group, the leader, and the organisational levels that are related to both employee well-being and organisational performance. We examine which types of resources are most important in predicting both employee well-being and performance. We identified 84 quantitative studies published in print and online from 2003 to November 2015. Resources at either of the four levels were related to both employee well-being and performance. We found no significant differences in employee well-being and organisational performance between the four levels of workplace resources, suggesting that interventions may focus on any of these levels. Cross-sectional studies showed stronger relationships with well-being and performance than longitudinal studies. Studies using objective performance ratings provided weaker relationships between resources and performance than self-rated and leader/third-party-rated studies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|