Health care public reporting utilization - user clusters, web trails, and usage barriers on Germany's public reporting portal Weisse-Liste.de.

Background: Quality of care public reporting provides structural, process and outcome information to facilitate hospital choice and strengthen quality competition. Yet, evidence indicates that patients rarely use this information in their decision-making, due to limited awareness of the data and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making Vol. 17; pp. 1 - 16
Autores principales: Pross, Christoph, Averdunk, Lars-Henrik, Stjepanovic, Josip, Busse, Reinhard, Geissler, Alexander
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 4/21/2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=122733329&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 122733329
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14726947
        1CI0
      jtl: BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making
      issn: 14726947
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 4/21/2017
      vid: 17
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        122733329
        122733329
        NLM28431546
        122733329
        10.1186/s12911-017-0440-6
        NLM28431546
        122733329
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Health care public reporting utilization - user clusters, web trails, and usage barriers on Germany's public reporting portal Weisse-Liste.de.
      aug:
        au:
          Pross, Christoph
          Averdunk, Lars-Henrik
          Stjepanovic, Josip
          Busse, Reinhard
          Geissler, Alexander
        affil: Dept. of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Administrative office H80, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Public Health
          Quality of Health Care
          Marketing
          Communication
          Public Opinion
          Community-Institutional Relations
          Information Seeking Behavior
          Internet
          Clinical Indicators
          Access to Information
          Germany
          Human
      ab: Background: Quality of care public reporting provides structural, process and outcome information to facilitate hospital choice and strengthen quality competition. Yet, evidence indicates that patients rarely use this information in their decision-making, due to limited awareness of the data and complex and conflicting information. While there is enthusiasm among policy makers for public reporting, clinicians and researchers doubt its overall impact. Almost no study has analyzed how users behave on public reporting portals, which information they seek out and when they abort their search.Methods: This study employs web-usage mining techniques on server log data of 17 million user actions from Germany's premier provider transparency portal Weisse-Liste.de (WL.de) between 2012 and 2015. Postal code and ICD search requests facilitate identification of geographical and treatment area usage patterns. User clustering helps to identify user types based on parameters like session length, referrer and page topic visited. First-level markov chains illustrate common click paths and premature exits.Results: In 2015, the WL.de Hospital Search portal had 2,750 daily users, with 25% mobile traffic, a bounce rate of 38% and 48% of users examining hospital quality information. From 2013 to 2015, user traffic grew at 38% annually. On average users spent 7 min on the portal, with 7.4 clicks and 54 s between clicks. Users request information for many oncologic and orthopedic conditions, for which no process or outcome quality indicators are available. Ten distinct user types, with particular usage patterns and interests, are identified. In particular, the different types of professional and non-professional users need to be addressed differently to avoid high premature exit rates at several key steps in the information search and view process. Of all users, 37% enter hospital information correctly upon entry, while 47% require support in their hospital search.Conclusions: Several onsite and offsite improvement options are identified. Public reporting needs to be directed at the interests of its users, with more outcome quality information for oncology and orthopedics. Customized reporting can cater to the different needs and skill levels of professional and non-professional users. Search engine optimization and hospital quality advocacy can increase website traffic.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N