Do levels of evidence affect breadth of service? A study on the use of clinical guidance in a learning disability service.
Accessible summary The government suggests to the NHS what talking psychological therapies should be given to people when they have worries or problems., This study examined a service for people with learning disabilities in Scotland. It tried to find out whether the service was doing what the gover...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 121 - 129 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=122762740&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 122762740 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13544187 F04 jtl: British Journal of Learning Disabilities issn: 13544187 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2017 vid: 45 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 122762740 122762740 122762740 10.1111/bld.12186 122762740 ppf: 121 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Do levels of evidence affect breadth of service? A study on the use of clinical guidance in a learning disability service. aug: au: Pateraki, Eleni Macmahon, Kenneth affil: Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Edinburgh UK sug: subj: Intellectual Disability Practice Guidelines Mental Health Services Psychotherapy Human Scotland Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Adult Random Sample Adult: 19-44 years ab: Accessible summary The government suggests to the NHS what talking psychological therapies should be given to people when they have worries or problems., This study examined a service for people with learning disabilities in Scotland. It tried to find out whether the service was doing what the government suggests., The study found that the people who were seen by the service often had more than one difficulty, and the service gave extra talking psychological therapy to them., We think that this study shows that people with learning disabilities should have more treatments available for them to meet their needs., Abstract Background For services across the UK, increasing emphasis is placed on the use of evidence-based psychological treatments. In this context, the Scottish Government published the MATRIX, a best-practice clinical governance document, with a brief section on therapies for people with learning disabilities. As with most clinical guidelines, randomised controlled trials were considered the 'gold standard.' However, within the learning disability field, the existing evidence base is relatively limited, resulting in a narrow guidance for services. Methods This study evaluated the use of best-practice guidance (the MATRIX), in a psychology service for adults with learning disabilities, covering one of the largest NHS Boards in Scotland. A randomly selected 50% ( N = 73) of case notes opened since October 2011 (publication date for the MATRIX) was reviewed. Eight case notes were second-rated by an independent clinician. Results Findings showed that service users typically presented with multiple psychological difficulties, and clinicians offered a range of therapies additional to those suggested in the guidance. This was particularly evident in cases managed by clinical psychologists. Conclusions Applying rigid therapeutic recommendations may limit opportunities for integrative practice. The potential impact of inflexibly adopting clinical guidelines on service planning and resources is discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|