Social Network Analysis as an Analytic Tool for Task Group Research: A Case Study of an Interdisciplinary Community of Practice.
Group counselors commonly collaborate in interdisciplinary settings in health care, substance abuse, and juvenile justice. Social network analysis is a methodology rarely used in counseling research yet has potential to examine task group dynamics in new ways. This case study explores the scholarly...
| Publicado en: | Journal for Specialists in Group Work Vol. 42; no. 2; pp. 152 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | case study tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jun2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=122857260&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 122857260 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01933922 JGW jtl: Journal for Specialists in Group Work issn: 01933922 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2017 vid: 42 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 122857260 122857260 122857260 10.1080/01933922.2017.1301610 122857260 ppf: 152 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Social Network Analysis as an Analytic Tool for Task Group Research: A Case Study of an Interdisciplinary Community of Practice. aug: au: Lockhart, Naorah C. affil: Binghamton University sug: subj: Multidisciplinary Care Team Psychotherapy, Group Social Networks Psychotherapists Collaboration Interpersonal Relations ab: Group counselors commonly collaborate in interdisciplinary settings in health care, substance abuse, and juvenile justice. Social network analysis is a methodology rarely used in counseling research yet has potential to examine task group dynamics in new ways. This case study explores the scholarly relationships among 36 members of an interdisciplinary community of practice. Findings suggest some disciplines work together more than others and members are more likely to interact interpersonally than in knowledge production. The study also finds members who are more central to the group than others, and subgroups that may be centers of work and creativity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: case study tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|