In vivo comparison of two navigation systems for abdominal percutaneous needle intervention.
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of a Kinect-Optical navigation system with an electromagnetic (EM) navigation system for percutaneous liver needle intervention. Materials and methods: Five beagles with nine artificial tumors were used for validation. The Veran IG4 EM navigation system and a custom-...
| Publicado en: | Abdominal Radiology Vol. 42; no. 7; pp. 1993 - 2001 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jul2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123716801&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 123716801 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 2366004X JT14 jtl: Abdominal Radiology issn: 2366004X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2017 vid: 42 iid: 7 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 123716801 144101451 10.1007/s00261-017-1083-x 123716801 ppf: 1993 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: In vivo comparison of two navigation systems for abdominal percutaneous needle intervention. aug: au: Xiao, Deqiang Li, Yong Luo, Huoling Zhang, Yanfang Guo, Xuejun Zheng, Huimin Hu, Qingmao Jia, Fucang affil: Department of Interventional Radiology , Shenzhen People's Hospital , No. 1017, Dongmen North Rd., Luohu Shenzhen China sug: ab: Purpose: To compare the accuracy of a Kinect-Optical navigation system with an electromagnetic (EM) navigation system for percutaneous liver needle intervention. Materials and methods: Five beagles with nine artificial tumors were used for validation. The Veran IG4 EM navigation system and a custom-made Kinect-Optical navigation system were used. Needle insertions into each tumor were conducted with these two guidance methods. The target positioning error (TPE) and the time cost of the puncture procedures were evaluated. Results: A total of 18 needle insertions were performed to evaluate the navigation accuracy of the two guidance approaches. The targeting error was 6.78 ± 3.22 mm and 8.72 ± 3.5 mm for the Kinect-Optical navigation system and the EM navigation system, respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the TPE between the Kinect-Optical navigation system and the EM navigation system ( p = 0.229). The processing time with the Kinect-Optical system (10 min) is similar to that of the Veran IG4 system (12 min). Conclusions: The accuracy of the Kinect-Optical navigation system is comparable to that of the EM navigation system. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|