Comparison of the effects of model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithms on software measurements in pulmonary subsolid nodules.

Objectives: To evaluate the differences between filtered back projection (FBP) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms on semi-automatic measurements in subsolid nodules (SSNs).Methods: Unenhanced CT scans of 73 SSNs obtained using the same protocol and reconstructed with both FBP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 27; no. 8; pp. 3266 - 3275
Autores principales: Cohen, Julien, Kim, Hyungjin, Park, Su, Ginneken, Bram, Ferretti, Gilbert, Lee, Chang, Goo, Jin, Park, Chang, Cohen, Julien G, Park, Su Bin, van Ginneken, Bram, Ferretti, Gilbert R, Lee, Chang Hyun, Goo, Jin Mo, Park, Chang Min
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123837847&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 123837847
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2017
      vid: 27
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        123837847
        123837847
        144119855
        NLM28058482
        10.1007/s00330-016-4716-5
        NLM28058482
        123837847
      ppf: 3266
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of the effects of model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithms on software measurements in pulmonary subsolid nodules.
      aug:
        au:
          Cohen, Julien
          Kim, Hyungjin
          Park, Su
          Ginneken, Bram
          Ferretti, Gilbert
          Lee, Chang
          Goo, Jin
          Park, Chang
          Cohen, Julien G
          Park, Su Bin
          van Ginneken, Bram
          Ferretti, Gilbert R
          Lee, Chang Hyun
          Goo, Jin Mo
          Park, Chang Min
        affil: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine , Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center , Geert Grooteplein 10 6525 GA Nijmegen The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms
          Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Methods
          Lung Neoplasms
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Female
          Male
          Aged
          Observer Bias
          Reproducibility of Results
          Lung Neoplasms Pathology
          Retrospective Design
          Middle Age
          Software
          Adult
          Radionuclide Imaging
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objectives: To evaluate the differences between filtered back projection (FBP) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms on semi-automatic measurements in subsolid nodules (SSNs).Methods: Unenhanced CT scans of 73 SSNs obtained using the same protocol and reconstructed with both FBP and MBIR algorithms were evaluated by two radiologists. Diameter, mean attenuation, mass and volume of whole nodules and their solid components were measured. Intra- and interobserver variability and differences between FBP and MBIR were then evaluated using Bland-Altman method and Wilcoxon tests.Results: Longest diameter, volume and mass of nodules and those of their solid components were significantly higher using MBIR (p < 0.05) with mean differences of 1.1% (limits of agreement, -6.4 to 8.5%), 3.2% (-20.9 to 27.3%) and 2.9% (-16.9 to 22.7%) and 3.2% (-20.5 to 27%), 6.3% (-51.9 to 64.6%), 6.6% (-50.1 to 63.3%), respectively. The limits of agreement between FBP and MBIR were within the range of intra- and interobserver variability for both algorithms with respect to the diameter, volume and mass of nodules and their solid components. There were no significant differences in intra- or interobserver variability between FBP and MBIR (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Semi-automatic measurements of SSNs significantly differed between FBP and MBIR; however, the differences were within the range of measurement variability.Key Points: • Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of measurements did not differ between FBP and MBIR. • Differences in SSNs' semi-automatic measurement induced by reconstruction algorithms were not clinically significant. • Semi-automatic measurement may be conducted regardless of reconstruction algorithm. • SSNs' semi-automated classification agreement (pure vs. part-solid) did not significantly differ between algorithms.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N