Having it Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics.
The article focuses on hybrid theories and modern metaethics. It states that hybrid metaethical theories claim that moral claims express belief-like and desire-like mental states, while moral judgments are constituted by belief-like and desire-like components. Also discussed is Mark Schroeder’s and...
| Publicado en: | Analysis Vol. 77; no. 1; pp. 197 - 212 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jan2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=123923736&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 123923736 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00032638 7OX jtl: Analysis issn: 00032638 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2017 vid: 77 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 123923736 10.1093/analys/anw031 ppf: 197 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 427KB tig: atl: Having it Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics. aug: au: SILK, ALEX affil: University of Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT su: Metaethics Theory of knowledge Moral judgment Judgment (Logic) Ethics sug: subj: Metaethics Theory of knowledge Moral judgment Judgment (Logic) Ethics ab: The article focuses on hybrid theories and modern metaethics. It states that hybrid metaethical theories claim that moral claims express belief-like and desire-like mental states, while moral judgments are constituted by belief-like and desire-like components. Also discussed is Mark Schroeder’s and Guy Fletcher's contributions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 The Analysis Trust. item: Analysis holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|