Text-Critical Witnesses and Methodology for Isolating a Distinctive D-Text in Acts.

Within the past decade, a few leading New Testament textual critics have challenged two major, long-standing convictions by urging that we should speak no longer (1) of "text-types" or (2) of two textual streams in the Acts of the Apostles. Certainly the term "type" is too rigid and definitive to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Novum Testamentum Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 225 - 297
Autor principal: Epp, Eldon Jay
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=123990293&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 123990293
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00481009
        C4I
      jtl: Novum Testamentum
      issn: 00481009
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2017
      vid: 59
      iid: 3
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        123990293
        10.1163/15685365-12341571
      ppf: 225
      ppct: 72
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 6.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Text-Critical Witnesses and Methodology for Isolating a Distinctive D-Text in Acts.
      aug:
        au: Epp, Eldon Jay
        affil:
          Emeritus Professor, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
          Adjunct Professor (2001-2017), Harvard Divinity School, Cambridge, USA
      su:
        New Testament
        Textual criticism
        Apostles
        Codex Sinaiticus (Biblical manuscript)
        Byzantine Christian literature
      sug:
        subj:
          New Testament
          Textual criticism
          Apostles
          Codex Sinaiticus (Biblical manuscript)
          Byzantine Christian literature
      keyword:
        "Western" text
        Acts
        Codex Bezae
        Codex Sinaiticus
        Codex Vaticanus
        D-Text
        New Testament textual criticism
        text-types
        textual clusters
        textual mixture
      ab: Within the past decade, a few leading New Testament textual critics have challenged two major, long-standing convictions by urging that we should speak no longer (1) of "text-types" or (2) of two textual streams in the Acts of the Apostles. Certainly the term "type" is too rigid and definitive to describe our textual groups, and "textual clusters" is more appropriate. The present essay concerns whether dual texts can be identified certifiably in Acts, thereby distinguishing a "D-Textual Cluster" from an alternate cluster headed by Codex Vaticanus (B) and Codex Sinaiticus (א). It is clear that all D-Text Primary witnesses are mixed texts that, over time in various ways, have been conformed and assimilated to the increasingly dominant B-Cluster, as well as to the ascending Byzantine text. A fresh method, however, is proposed and illustrated at length (1) to identify a tightly cohesive group of Primary witnesses to a D-Textual Cluster, which (2) reveals that these D-Text readings virtually always are opposed by the א-B-Cluster. The result is a strong testimony to the early existence of dual textual streams in Acts that stand firmly over against one another. The fresh aspect of the method involves, for each variation -unit, (1) identifying the Primary witnesses available for a given reading; (2) counting the number supporting a presumptive D-Text reading; (3) counting those that do not; and (4) calculating the percentages of witnesses agreeing and not agreeing to the readings in question. Three or more Primary witnesses must be present in a variation-unit to be included. The global figures show that available Primary D-Text witnesses agree with one another 88% of the time on readings in 425 variation-units, while 97% of the time these readings are opposed by both א and B together.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Novum Testamentum is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Novum Testamentum
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N