MORAL PERSONHOOD AND HUMANS WITH TAILS: EXPLORING THE BOUNDS OF THE MORAL.

I argue that attempts to explain the objective bindingness of morality by appeal to contingent facts about human nature renders the bounds of morality unsettlingly arbitrary. It provides no principled explanation for the bounds of morality and determinations of who deserves moral standing. This can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Appraisal Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 20 - 26
Autor principal: Kisilevsky, Sari
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: British Personalist Forum Spring2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=124102944&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 124102944
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13583336
        8WAB
      jtl: Appraisal
      issn: 13583336
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2016
      vid: 11
      iid: 1
      pid: 52349
      pub: British Personalist Forum
    artinfo:
      ui: 124102944
      ppf: 20
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 780KB
      tig:
        atl: MORAL PERSONHOOD AND HUMANS WITH TAILS: EXPLORING THE BOUNDS OF THE MORAL.
      aug:
        au: Kisilevsky, Sari
        affil: Queens College, City University of New York
      su:
        Ethics
        Human behavior
        Aversion
        Human beings
        Anthropology
      sug:
        subj:
          Ethics
          Human behavior
          Aversion
          Human beings
          Anthropology
      keyword:
        Human Beings
        Metaethics
        Moral Anthropology
        Moral Arbitrariness
        Moral Standing
        Personhood
        Persons
      ab: I argue that attempts to explain the objective bindingness of morality by appeal to contingent facts about human nature renders the bounds of morality unsettlingly arbitrary. It provides no principled explanation for the bounds of morality and determinations of who deserves moral standing. This can lead to an expansion of the moral universe. But it fails to guard against drawing distinctions among human beings that are ordinarily thought to be morally repugnant.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Appraisal is the property of British Personalist Forum and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Appraisal
      holder: British Personalist Forum
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N