Grammatical Morphology in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With and Without Language Impairment: The Case of Dutch Plurals and Past Participles.

Purpose: Grammatical morphology is often a locus of difficulty for both children with language impairment (LI) and bilingual children. In contrast to previous research that mainly focused on verbal tense and agreement markings, the present study investigated whether plural and past participle format...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 60; no. 7; pp. 2064 - 2081
Autores principales: Boerma, Tessel, Wijnen, Frank, Leseman, Paul, Blom, Elma
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jul2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=124123730&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 124123730
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2017
      vid: 60
      iid: 7
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        124123730
        10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0351
      ppf: 2064
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 7.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Grammatical Morphology in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With and Without Language Impairment: The Case of Dutch Plurals and Past Participles.
      aug:
        au:
          Boerma, Tessel
          Wijnen, Frank
          Leseman, Paul
          Blom, Elma
        affil:
          Utrecht University, Department of Special Education, the Netherlands
          Utrecht University, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, the Netherlands
      su:
        Netherlands
        Monolingualism
        Bilingualism in children
        Native language
        Comparative grammar
        Language disorders
        Multilingualism
        Speech
        Socioeconomic factors
        Morphology (Grammar)
        Dutch language
        Language disorders in children
        Number (Grammar)
        Specific language impairment in children
        Grammar
        Chi-squared test
        Comparative studies
        Longitudinal method
        Probability theory
        Questionnaires
        Mathematical variables
      sug:
        subj:
          Monolingualism
          Bilingualism in children
          Native language
          Comparative grammar
          Language disorders
          Multilingualism
          Speech
          Socioeconomic factors
          Netherlands
          Morphology (Grammar)
          Dutch language
          Language disorders in children
          Number (Grammar)
          Specific language impairment in children
          Grammar
          Chi-squared test
          Comparative studies
          Longitudinal method
          Probability theory
          Questionnaires
          Mathematical variables
      ab: Purpose: Grammatical morphology is often a locus of difficulty for both children with language impairment (LI) and bilingual children. In contrast to previous research that mainly focused on verbal tense and agreement markings, the present study investigated whether plural and past participle formation can disentangle the effects of LI and bilingualism and, in addition, can point to weaknesses of LI that hold across monolingual and bilingual contexts. Method: Monolingual and bilingual children with and without LI (n = 33 per group) were tested at 2 waves with a word formation task that elicited Dutch noun plurals and past participles. The quantity and quality of errors as well as children's development over time were examined. Results: The plural formation task discriminated between monolingual children with and without LI, but a less differentiated picture emerged in the bilingual group. Moreover, plural accuracy showed fully overlapping language profiles of monolinguals with LI and bilinguals without LI, in contrast to accuracy scores on the past participle formation task. Error analyses suggested that frequent omission of participial affixes may be indicative of LI, irrespective of lingual status. Conclusion: The elicited production of past participles may support a reliable diagnosis of LI in monolingual and bilingual learning contexts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N