A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.
Purpose: To identify currently available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in patients with foot or ankle diseases; and to critically appraise, compare and synthesize the psychometric evidence for the identified PROMs.Methods: Literature searches were performed in Medline and EMBASE fro...
| Publicado en: | Quality of Life Research Vol. 26; no. 8; pp. 1969 - 2011 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=124132425&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 124132425 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09629343 GPQ jtl: Quality of Life Research issn: 09629343 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2017 vid: 26 iid: 8 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 124132425 124132425 144071637 NLM28315178 124132425 10.1007/s11136-017-1542-4 NLM28315178 124132425 ppf: 1969 ppct: 42 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases. aug: au: Jia, Yuanxi Huang, Hsiaomin Gagnier, Joel Gagnier, Joel J affil: Bloomberg School of Public Health , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore USA sug: subj: Foot Pathology Quality of Life Psychosocial Factors Ankle Pathology Psychometrics Methods Aged, 80 and Over Adolescence Aged Adult Human Middle Age Young Adult Systematic Review Scales Questionnaires Checklists Aged, 80 & over Adolescent: 13-18 years Aged: 65+ years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years ab: Purpose: To identify currently available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in patients with foot or ankle diseases; and to critically appraise, compare and synthesize the psychometric evidence for the identified PROMs.Methods: Literature searches were performed in Medline and EMBASE from their inception to January 25th, 2016. Methodological quality was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. The final rating of the methodological quality of each study for each property was the lowest rating among the items within that property. The psychometric evidence of the properties investigated in the included articles was assessed using the quality criteria established by Terwee et al. The methodological quality ratings and psychometric evidence assessments were synthesized using the method first proposed by Schellingerhout et al.Results: In total, 3077 articles were identified by the literature search, from which 115 studies investigating 50 PRO instruments were included in the review process. The Foot Function Index (FFI) was the most explored instrument, while the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) demonstrated the best properties.Conclusion: Most PROMs on foot and ankle diseases have limited evidence for their psychometric properties. The MOXFQ, with the highest overall ratings, could be a useful PROM for evaluating patients with foot or ankle diseases, based on current available evidence. More research is needed to improve the quality of the standards used to assess PROMs and the studies making these assessments. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|