Desigualdad e inclusión: La ruta del estado de seguridad social chileno, 1920–1970.
This article analyzes the institutionalization of Chilean social security policy and its unequal distribution of resources from 1920 to 1970. From 1924 to 1931, when new labor legislation was introduced, Chile built a social security system divided into two major bodies: one comprehensive and public...
| Publicado en: | Hispanic American Historical Review Vol. 97; no. 3; pp. 485 - 522 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Duke University Press
Aug2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=124226427&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 124226427 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00182168 HAH jtl: Hispanic American Historical Review issn: 00182168 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2017 vid: 97 iid: 3 pid: 154 pub: Duke University Press artinfo: ui: 124226427 10.1215/00182168-3933852 ppf: 485 ppct: 37 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.5MB tig: atl: Desigualdad e inclusión: La ruta del estado de seguridad social chileno, 1920–1970. aug: au: Rengifo, Francisca affil: Associate Professor at the School of Government and a researcher in the Center for the Study of Political History at the Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez.. su: Social security Equality Social security laws Employment History of legislation Public welfare Economic conditions in Chile, 1918-1970 Twentieth century History Social policy Chile sug: subj: Chile Social security Equality Social security laws Employment History of legislation Public welfare Economic conditions in Chile, 1918-1970 Twentieth century History Social policy ab: This article analyzes the institutionalization of Chilean social security policy and its unequal distribution of resources from 1920 to 1970. From 1924 to 1931, when new labor legislation was introduced, Chile built a social security system divided into two major bodies: one comprehensive and public, the other private and organized by type of employment. This article seeks to demonstrate that the combined efforts of these two sectors to extend benefits to the entire Chilean population were insufficient to eradicate inherent inequalities. To explain this trajectory, the article examines the legally defined space for action by public, semipublic, and private administrative entities in which the various actors discussed and negotiated how to implement social security. This implementation was not an inevitable outcome but rather the result of a series of specific policy choices. This perspective allows insight into how the paradigm of welfare as a social right resulted in practice in segmented social security policy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Spanish refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Hispanic American Historical Review is the property of Duke University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Hispanic American Historical Review holder: Duke University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|