Does Philosophy Require a Weak Transcendental Approach?

Despite any shortcomings of Kant's transcendental philosophy, the spirit (rather than the letter) of Kant's approach is correct. In particular, Kant is correct to believe (1) an accurate account of the types of 'access' humans possess to internal and empirical content should form the groundwork for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Metaphilosophy Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 550 - 572
Autor principal: Reider, Patrick J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=124256093&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 124256093
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00261068
        9OM
      jtl: Metaphilosophy
      issn: 00261068
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2017
      vid: 48
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        124256093
        10.1111/meta.12257
      ppf: 550
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 133KB
      tig:
        atl: Does Philosophy Require a Weak Transcendental Approach?
      aug:
        au: Reider, Patrick J.
      su:
        Transcendentalism (Philosophy)
        Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804
        Constructivism (Philosophy)
        Epistemic logic
        A priori
      sug:
        subj:
          Transcendentalism (Philosophy)
          Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804
          Constructivism (Philosophy)
          Epistemic logic
          A priori
      keyword:
        access
        constructivism
        Kant
        mind
        synthesis
        transcendental philosophy
      ab: Despite any shortcomings of Kant's transcendental philosophy, the spirit (rather than the letter) of Kant's approach is correct. In particular, Kant is correct to believe (1) an accurate account of the types of 'access' humans possess to internal and empirical content should form the groundwork for epistemic and ethical investigation and (2) epistemic and ethical investigations cannot successfully circumvent this groundwork. In this context, the term 'access' concerns the mental processes that render internal and external experience possible. In supporting the above claims, this article outlines and defends what can be considered a weak version of Kant's transcendental approach. This weaker approach does not require the achievement of synthetic a priori judgments, which permit deductive conclusions concerning possible experience (as opposed to a strong approach, which maintains these requirements).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Metaphilosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N