Random forests as cumulative effects models: A case study of lakes and rivers in Muskoka, Canada.

Cumulative effects assessment (CEA) ― a type of environmental appraisal ― lacks effective methods for modeling cumulative effects, evaluating indicators of ecosystem condition, and exploring the likely outcomes of development scenarios. Random forests are an extension of classification and regressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Environmental Management Vol. 201; pp. 407 - 425
Autores principales: Jones, F. Chris, Plewes, Rachel, Murison, Lorna, MacDougall, Mark J., Sinclair, Sarah, Davies, Christie, Bailey, John L., Richardson, Murray, Gunn, John
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. Oct2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=124302779&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 124302779
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03014797
        EMJ
      jtl: Journal of Environmental Management
      issn: 03014797
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2017
      vid: 201
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        124302779
        10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.011
      ppf: 407
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Random forests as cumulative effects models: A case study of lakes and rivers in Muskoka, Canada.
      aug:
        au:
          Jones, F. Chris
          Plewes, Rachel
          Murison, Lorna
          MacDougall, Mark J.
          Sinclair, Sarah
          Davies, Christie
          Bailey, John L.
          Richardson, Murray
          Gunn, John
        affil:
          Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Dorset Environmental Science Centre, 1026 Bellwood Acres Road, Dorset, P0A1E0, Canada
          Carleton University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, Canada
          Credit Valley Conservation, 1255 Old Derry Road, Mississauga, L5N 6R4, Canada
          River Labs, River Institute, 2 St Lawrence Drive, Cornwall, K6H 4Z1, Canada
          Conservation Ontario, Dorset Environmental Science Centre, 1026 Bellwood Acres Road, Dorset, P0A1E0, Canada
          Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Dorset Environmental Science Centre, 1026 Bellwood Acres Road, Dorset, Canada
          Ontario Ministry of Environment & Climate Change, Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, P3E 2C6, Canada
          Carleton University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, B349 Loeb Building, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada
          Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit, Living With Lakes Centre, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, P3E 2C6, Canada
      su:
        Lake ecology
        Cumulative effects assessment (Environmental assessment)
        Random forest algorithms
        Ecological models
        Environmental management
      sug:
        subj:
          Lake ecology
          Cumulative effects assessment (Environmental assessment)
          Random forest algorithms
          Ecological models
          Environmental management
      keyword:
        Cumulative effects
        Indicators
        Lakes
        Rivers
        Cumulative effects
        Indicators
        Lakes
        Rivers
      ab: Cumulative effects assessment (CEA) ― a type of environmental appraisal ― lacks effective methods for modeling cumulative effects, evaluating indicators of ecosystem condition, and exploring the likely outcomes of development scenarios. Random forests are an extension of classification and regression trees, which model response variables by recursive partitioning. Random forests were used to model a series of candidate ecological indicators that described lakes and rivers from a case study watershed (The Muskoka River Watershed, Canada). Suitability of the candidate indicators for use in cumulative effects assessment and watershed monitoring was assessed according to how well they could be predicted from natural habitat features and how sensitive they were to human land-use. The best models explained 75% of the variation in a multivariate descriptor of lake benthic-macroinvertebrate community structure, and 76% of the variation in the conductivity of river water. Similar results were obtained by cross-validation. Several candidate indicators detected a simulated doubling of urban land-use in their catchments, and a few were able to detect a simulated doubling of agricultural land-use. The paper demonstrates that random forests can be used to describe the combined and singular effects of multiple stressors and natural environmental factors, and furthermore, that random forests can be used to evaluate the performance of monitoring indicators. The numerical methods presented are applicable to any ecosystem and indicator type, and therefore represent a step forward for CEA.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N