Opening Black Boxes is Not Enough – Data-based Surveillance in Discipline and Punish and Today.
Discipline and Punish analyzes the role of collecting, managing, and operationalizing data in disciplinary institutions. Foucault's discussion is compared to contemporary forms of surveillance and security practices using algorithmic data processing. The article highlights important similarities and...
| Publicado en: | Foucault Studies no. 23; pp. 27 - 46 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
Aug2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=124780242&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 124780242 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18325203 1COW jtl: Foucault Studies issn: 18325203 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2017 iid: 23 pid: 4636 pub: University of Pennsylvania Press artinfo: ui: 124780242 10.22439/fs.v0i0.5340 ppf: 27 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 4.5MB tig: atl: Opening Black Boxes is Not Enough – Data-based Surveillance in Discipline and Punish and Today. aug: au: Matzner, Tobias affil: Paderborn University su: Discipline & Punish (Book) Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984 Big data Algorithms Information technology sug: subj: Discipline & Punish (Book) Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984 Big data Algorithms Information technology keyword: algorithmic surveillance Big Data Discipline and Punish norms Societies of Control subjectivity ab: Discipline and Punish analyzes the role of collecting, managing, and operationalizing data in disciplinary institutions. Foucault's discussion is compared to contemporary forms of surveillance and security practices using algorithmic data processing. The article highlights important similarities and differences regarding the way data processing plays a part in subjectivation. This is also compared to Deleuzian accounts and Foucault's later discussion in Security, Territory, Population. Using these results, the article argues that the prevailing focus on transparency and accountability in the discussion of algorithmic applications needs to be amended with a perspective on different forms of subjectivity and ensuing power relations. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Foucault Studies is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Foucault Studies holder: University of Pennsylvania Press dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|