Efficacy of a Community- Versus Primary Care-Centered Program for Childhood Obesity: TX CORD RCT.

Objective: This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine comparative efficacy of a 12-month community-centered weight management program (MEND2-5 for ages 2-5 or MEND/CATCH6-12 for ages 6-12) against a primary care-centered program (Next Steps) in low-income children.Methods: Five hund...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Obesity (19307381) Vol. 25; no. 9; pp. 1584 - 1594
Autores principales: Butte, Nancy F., Hoelscher, Deanna M., Barlow, Sarah E., Pont, Stephen, Durand, Casey, Vandewater, Elizabeth A., Liu, Yan, Adolph, Anne L., Pérez, Adriana, Wilson, Theresa A., Gonzalez, Alejandra, Puyau, Maurice R., Sharma, Shreela V., Byrd‐Williams, Courtney, Oluyomi, Abiodun, Huang, Terry, Finkelstein, Eric A., Sacher, Paul M., Kelder, Steven H.
Formato: research randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=124833824&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 124833824
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19307381
        GSO
      jtl: Obesity (19307381)
      issn: 19307381
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2017
      vid: 25
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        124833824
        124833824
        NLM28703504
        124833824
        10.1002/oby.21929
        NLM28703504
        124833824
      ppf: 1584
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Efficacy of a Community- Versus Primary Care-Centered Program for Childhood Obesity: TX CORD RCT.
      aug:
        au:
          Butte, Nancy F.
          Hoelscher, Deanna M.
          Barlow, Sarah E.
          Pont, Stephen
          Durand, Casey
          Vandewater, Elizabeth A.
          Liu, Yan
          Adolph, Anne L.
          Pérez, Adriana
          Wilson, Theresa A.
          Gonzalez, Alejandra
          Puyau, Maurice R.
          Sharma, Shreela V.
          Byrd‐Williams, Courtney
          Oluyomi, Abiodun
          Huang, Terry
          Finkelstein, Eric A.
          Sacher, Paul M.
          Kelder, Steven H.
        affil: USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Primary Health Care Administration
          Community Networks Administration
          Pediatric Obesity Therapy
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Child, Preschool
          Child
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective: This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine comparative efficacy of a 12-month community-centered weight management program (MEND2-5 for ages 2-5 or MEND/CATCH6-12 for ages 6-12) against a primary care-centered program (Next Steps) in low-income children.Methods: Five hundred forty-nine Hispanic and black children (BMI ≥ 85th percentile), stratified by age groups (2-5, 6-8, and 9-12 years), were randomly assigned to MEND2-5 (27 contact hours)/MEND/CATCH6-12 (121.5 contact hours) or Next Steps (8 contact hours). Primary (BMI value at the 95th percentile [%BMIp95 ]) and secondary outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 months (Intensive Phase), and 12 months (Transition Phase).Results: For age group 6-8, MEND/CATCH6-12 resulted in greater improvement in %BMIp95 than Next Steps during the Intensive Phase. Effect size (95% CI) was -1.94 (-3.88, -0.01) percentage points (P = 0.05). For age group 9-12, effect size was -1.38 (-2.87, 0.16) percentage points for %BMIp95 (P = 0.07). MEND2-5 did not differentially affect %BMIp95 . Attendance averaged 52% and 22% during the Intensive and Transition Phases. Intervention compliance was inversely correlated to change in %BMIp95 during the Intensive Phase (P < 0.05). In the Transition Phase, %BMIp95 was maintained or rebounded in both programs (P < 0.05).Conclusions: MEND/CATCH6-12 was more efficacious for BMI reduction at 3 months but not 12 months compared to Next Steps in underserved children. Intervention compliance influenced outcomes, emphasizing the need for research in sustaining family engagement in low-income populations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N