Dynamical versus structural explanations in scientific revolutions.

By briefly reviewing three well-known scientific revolutions in fundamental physics (the discovery of inertia, of special relativity and of general relativity), I claim that problems that were supposed to be crying for a dynamical explanation in the old paradigm ended up receiving a structural expla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 194; no. 7; pp. 2307 - 2328
Autor principal: Dorato, Mauro
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=124845993&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 124845993
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2017
      vid: 194
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        124845993
        10.1007/s11229-014-0546-7
      ppf: 2307
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 506KB
      tig:
        atl: Dynamical versus structural explanations in scientific revolutions.
      aug:
        au: Dorato, Mauro
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Communication and Media Studies, Section of Philosophy , University of Rome Three , Viale Ostiense 234 00144 Rome Italy
      su:
        Scientific Revolution
        Structuralism
        Symmetries (Quantum mechanics)
        Special relativity (Physics)
        Inertia (Mechanics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Scientific Revolution
          Structuralism
          Symmetries (Quantum mechanics)
          Special relativity (Physics)
          Inertia (Mechanics)
      keyword:
        Dynamical explanation
        Inertia
        Physical fundamentality
        Scientific revolution
        Spatiotemporal symmetries
        Structural explanation
      ab: By briefly reviewing three well-known scientific revolutions in fundamental physics (the discovery of inertia, of special relativity and of general relativity), I claim that problems that were supposed to be crying for a dynamical explanation in the old paradigm ended up receiving a structural explanation in the new one. This claim is meant to give more substance to Kuhn's view that revolutions are accompanied by a shift in what needs to be explained, while suggesting at the same time the existence of a pattern that is common to all of the discussed case-studies. It remains to be seen whether also quantum mechanics, in particular entanglement, conforms to this pattern.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2017. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N