A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Purpose: Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes following colorectal surgery. The absence of this information makes it difficult to inform patients about the near-term effects of surgery, beyond outcomes assessed by traditional clinical measures. This study was designed to provide infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Supportive Care in Cancer Vol. 25; no. 10; pp. 3103 - 3113
Autores principales: Hedrick, Traci, Harrigan, Amy, Thiele, Robert, Friel, Charles, Kozower, Benjamin, Stukenborg, George, Hedrick, Traci L, Harrigan, Amy M, Thiele, Robert H, Friel, Charles M, Kozower, Benjamin D, Stukenborg, George J
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=124892783&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 124892783
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09414355
        O1J
      jtl: Supportive Care in Cancer
      issn: 09414355
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2017
      vid: 25
      iid: 10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        124892783
        124892783
        144165392
        NLM28439726
        124892783
        10.1007/s00520-017-3718-4
        NLM28439726
        124892783
      ppf: 3103
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
      aug:
        au:
          Hedrick, Traci
          Harrigan, Amy
          Thiele, Robert
          Friel, Charles
          Kozower, Benjamin
          Stukenborg, George
          Hedrick, Traci L
          Harrigan, Amy M
          Thiele, Robert H
          Friel, Charles M
          Kozower, Benjamin D
          Stukenborg, George J
        affil: Department of Surgery , University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Surgery, Digestive System Rehabilitation
          Colorectal Neoplasms Rehabilitation
          Colorectal Neoplasms Surgery
          Outcome Assessment
          Male
          Depression Epidemiology
          Postoperative Complications Epidemiology
          Adult
          Quality of Life
          Aged
          Colorectal Neoplasms Psychosocial Factors
          Postoperative Period
          Middle Age
          Colorectal Neoplasms Epidemiology
          Pilot Studies
          Female
          Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index
          Impact of Events Scale
          Scales
          Social Readjustment Rating Scale
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes following colorectal surgery. The absence of this information makes it difficult to inform patients about the near-term effects of surgery, beyond outcomes assessed by traditional clinical measures. This study was designed to provide information about the effects of colorectal surgery on physical, mental, and social well-being outcomes.Methods: The NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Assessment Center was used to collect patient responses prior to surgery and at their routine postoperative visit. Four domains were selected based on patient consultation and clinical experience: depression, pain interference, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and interest in sexual activity. Multilevel random coefficient models were used to assess the change in scores during the follow-up period and to assess the statistical significance of differences in trends over time associated with key clinical measures.Results: In total, 142 patients were consented, with 107 patients completing pre- and postoperative assessments (75%). Preoperative assessments were typically completed 1 month prior to surgery (mean 29.5 days before, SD = 19.7) and postoperative assessments 1 month after surgery (mean 30.7 days after, SD = 9.2), with a mean of 60.3 days between assessment dates. Patients demonstrated no statistically significant changes in scores for pain interference (-0.18 points, p = 0.80) or the ability to participate in social roles and activities (0.44 points, p = 0.55), but had significant decreases in depression scores between pre- and postoperative assessments (-1.6 points, p = 0.03) and near significant increases in scores for interest in sex (1.5 points, p = 0.06). Pain interference scores for patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased (3.5 points, p = 0.03). Scores for the interest in sex domain decreased (worsened) for patients with oncologic etiology (-3.7 points, p = 0.03). No other differences in score trends by patient characteristics were large enough to be statistically significant at the p < 0.05 threshold.Conclusion: These data suggest that the majority of patients quickly return to baseline physical, mental, and social function following colorectal surgery. This information can be used preoperatively to counsel patients about the typical impact of colorectal surgery on quality of life.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N