Within-Group Effect Size Benchmarks for Cognitive--Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Adult Depression.
This article provides benchmark data on within-group effect sizes from published randomized clinical trials supporting the efficacy of cognitive--behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of adult depression. Data from 84 studies that met the inclusion criteria were recorded independently by the two...
| Publicado en: | Social Work Research Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 135 - 145 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Sep2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=124995504&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 124995504 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10705309 SWK jtl: Social Work Research issn: 10705309 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2017 vid: 41 iid: 3 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 124995504 10.1093/swr/svx011 ppf: 135 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 614KB tig: atl: Within-Group Effect Size Benchmarks for Cognitive--Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Adult Depression. aug: au: Rubin, Allen Miao Yu affil: Professor, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston Research assistant, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston su: Mental depression Therapeutics Cognitive therapy Benchmarking (Management) Confidence intervals Psychology information storage & retrieval systems MEDLINE Meta-analysis Online information services Systematic reviews Comorbidity Pre-tests & post-tests sug: subj: Mental depression Therapeutics Cognitive therapy Benchmarking (Management) Confidence intervals Psychology information storage & retrieval systems MEDLINE Meta-analysis Online information services Systematic reviews Comorbidity Pre-tests & post-tests keyword: benchmarking cognitive--behavioral therapy depression implementation science research-supported interventions benchmarking cognitive--behavioral therapy depression implementation science research-supported interventions ab: This article provides benchmark data on within-group effect sizes from published randomized clinical trials supporting the efficacy of cognitive--behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of adult depression. Data from 84 studies that met the inclusion criteria were recorded independently by the two authors, with a 95.8% agreement rate. Aggregate within-group effect size benchmarks are provided for CBT groups and control groups and are broken down by level of depression, type of control group, type of CBT approach, type of depression measure, type of data analysis (intent-to-treat versus completers, only), and whether participants had any comorbidity. Overall, the aggregate within-group effect size estimates for CBT groups were 1.19 for self-report outcome measures and 1.52 for interviews. For control groups the estimate was 0.48 for self-reports and interviews. When treating depressed adult clients, community-based practitioners can use these benchmarks as a comparison tool to evaluate the adequacy of the way they are adopting or adapting CBT and in making decisions about whether to continue providing CBT in the same manner or to modify or replace it. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|