Intersections of gender and water: comparative approaches to everyday gendered negotiations of water access in underserved areas of Accra, Ghana and Cape Town, South Africa.

A large and growing body of literature suggests that women and men often have differentiated relationships to water access, uses, knowledges, governance, and experiences. From a feminist political ecology perspective, these relationships can be mediated by gendered labour practices (within the house...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Gender Studies Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 561 - 583
Autores principales: Harris, L., Kleiber, D., Goldin, J., Darkwah, A., Morinville, C.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=125035071&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 125035071
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09589236
        JGS
      jtl: Journal of Gender Studies
      issn: 09589236
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2017
      vid: 26
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        125035071
        10.1080/09589236.2016.1150819
      ppf: 561
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 125035071
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 125035071
      tig:
        atl: Intersections of gender and water: comparative approaches to everyday gendered negotiations of water access in underserved areas of Accra, Ghana and Cape Town, South Africa.
      aug:
        au:
          Harris, L.
          Kleiber, D.
          Goldin, J.
          Darkwah, A.
          Morinville, C.
        affil:
          Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
          International Coastal Network, Memorial University, St. John's, Canada
          Institute for Water Studies, University of Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
          Department of Sociology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
          Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
      su:
        Interpersonal relations
        Man-woman relationships
        Gender identity
        Feminism
        Political ecology
        Masculinity
      sug:
        subj:
          Interpersonal relations
          Man-woman relationships
          Gender identity
          Feminism
          Political ecology
          Masculinity
      keyword:
        gender
        Ghana
        intersectionality
        methods
        South Africa
        triangulation
        water
        gender
        Ghana
        intersectionality
        methods
        South Africa
        triangulation
        water
      ab: A large and growing body of literature suggests that women and men often have differentiated relationships to water access, uses, knowledges, governance, and experiences. From a feminist political ecology perspective, these relationships can be mediated by gendered labour practices (within the household, at the community level, or within the workplace), socio-cultural expectations (e.g. related to notions of masculinity and femininity), as well as intersectional differences (e.g. race, income, and so forth). While these relationships are complex, multiple, and vary by context, it is frequently argued that due to responsibility for domestic provision or other pathways, women may be particularly affected if water quality or access is compromised. This paper reports on a statistical evaluation of a 478 household survey conducted in underserved areas of Accra, Ghana and Cape Town, South Africa in early 2012. Interrogating our survey results in the light of the ideas of gender differentiated access, uses, knowledges, governance, and experiences of water, we open up considerations related to the context of each of our study sites, and also invite possible revisions and new directions for these debates. In particular, we are interested in the instances where differences among male and female respondents were less pronounced than expected. Highlighting these unexpected results we find it helpful to draw attention to methods – in particular we argue that a binary male–female approach is not that meaningful for the analysis, and instead, gender analysis requires some attention to intersectional differences (e.g. homeownership, employment, or age). We also make the case for the importance of combining qualitative and quantitative work to understand these relationships, as well as opening up what might be learned by more adequately exploring the resonances and tensions between these approaches.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N