Hybrid Speech Acts: A Theory of Normative Thought and Language That 'Has It Both Ways'.
In this essay, I propose a novel hybrid metanormative theory. According to this theory, speakers making normative claims express both cognitive and motivational attitudes in virtue of the constitutive norms of the particular speech acts they perform. This view has four principal virtues: (1) it is c...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 785 - 808 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125295878&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 125295878 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09668373 7PU jtl: European Journal of Philosophy issn: 09668373 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2017 vid: 25 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 125295878 10.1111/ejop.12161 ppf: 785 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 212KB tig: atl: Hybrid Speech Acts: A Theory of Normative Thought and Language That 'Has It Both Ways'. aug: au: Morgan, Andrew affil: Corcoran Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia, 120 Cocke Hall, P.O. Box 400780, Charlottesville VA, 22904, USA su: Semantics Pragmatics Speech acts (Linguistics) Copp, David Philosophers sug: subj: Semantics Pragmatics Speech acts (Linguistics) Copp, David Philosophers ab: In this essay, I propose a novel hybrid metanormative theory. According to this theory, speakers making normative claims express both cognitive and motivational attitudes in virtue of the constitutive norms of the particular speech acts they perform. This view has four principal virtues: (1) it is consistent with traditional semantic theories, (2) it supports a form of motivational judgment internalism that does justice to externalist intuitions, (3) it illuminates the connection between normative language and normative thought, and (4) it explains how speakers can express different conative states when speaking in different normative domains. In the first section, I discuss the theories of Stephen Finlay and David Copp. I show that they each come very close to having it both ways but ultimately fail. Understanding the shortcomings of these views is instrumental to a clear presentation of my own Hybrid Speech Act theory in section two. In the final section, I demonstrate how my view achieves its four advantages. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: European Journal of Philosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|