Say No to Lacanian Musicology: A Review of Misnomers.
Anglophone musicologists read the cultural theorist Slavoj Žižek more than they read the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, and they are more concerned with Žižekian academia than they are with Lacan's clinical practice. Two major problems emerge: Lacan is conflated with Žižek, and Lacan is conflat...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Žižek Studies Vol. 11; no. 3; pp. 248 - 271 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
International Journal of Zizek Studies
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125301287&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 125301287 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17518229 7834 jtl: International Journal of Žižek Studies issn: 17518229 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2017 vid: 11 iid: 3 pid: 59861 pub: International Journal of Zizek Studies artinfo: ui: 125301287 ppf: 248 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.1MB tig: atl: Say No to Lacanian Musicology: A Review of Misnomers. aug: au: Smethurst, Reilly su: Musicology Musicologists Lacan, Jacques, 1901-1981 sug: subj: Musicology Musicologists Lacan, Jacques, 1901-1981 keyword: Immanuel Kant Jacques Lacan Slavoj Žižek ab: Anglophone musicologists read the cultural theorist Slavoj Žižek more than they read the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, and they are more concerned with Žižekian academia than they are with Lacan's clinical practice. Two major problems emerge: Lacan is conflated with Žižek, and Lacan is conflated with Kant. As a result, analytic discourse is confused with post-modern academia as well as an eighteenth-century master-discourse on the Sublime. According to the author's argument, Lacanian musicology is a misnomer, for it in fact refers to Žižekian musicology, and what musicologists call the Lacanian Real is not really Lacanian. The re-branding of the Kantian Sublime and/or the Thing as the Lacanian Real is not necessary; it is a symptom of confusion. The article concludes with a cautious recommendation, pertinent to the study of music and discourses (understood as ideologies, group ties or social bonds). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of International Journal of Žižek Studies is the property of International Journal of Zizek Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: International Journal of Žižek Studies holder: International Journal of Zizek Studies dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|