Comparing the WeeFIM and PEDI in neurorehabilitation for children with acquired brain injury: A systematic review.
Introduction: We sought to compare the suitability of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) as outcome measures in rehabilitation of children with acquired brain injury (ABI).Methods: We performed a systematic review of...
| Publicado en: | Developmental Neurorehabilitation Vol. 20; no. 7; pp. 443 - 452 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=125434152&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 125434152 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17518423 2Y75 jtl: Developmental Neurorehabilitation issn: 17518423 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2017 vid: 20 iid: 7 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 125434152 125434152 125434152 10.1080/17518423.2017.1289419 125434152 ppf: 443 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparing the WeeFIM and PEDI in neurorehabilitation for children with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. aug: au: Williams, Katie S. Young, David K. Burke, G. A. Amos Fountain, Daniel M. affil: Department of Paediatric Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK sug: subj: Brain Injuries In Infancy and Childhood Research Instruments Evaluation Human Child Systematic Review Severity of Illness Indices Child: 6-12 years ab: Introduction: We sought to compare the suitability of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) as outcome measures in rehabilitation of children with acquired brain injury (ABI).Methods: We performed a systematic review of the evidence base using five databases. PRISMA guidelines were adhered to and the review was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number CRD42015025370).Results: Twenty-six retrospective studies were included. Twelve studies utilized the PEDI, thirteen studies the WeeFIM, and one study included both. Statistically significant responsiveness was demonstrated for both the WeeFIM and PEDI, although significant ceiling effects were detected. Evidence of clinically significant responsiveness was limited to one center utilizing the PEDI.Conclusion: Although requiring licensing to use, the WeeFIM is more suitable for the inpatient setting, is quicker to administer and showed minimal ceiling effects compared to the PEDI counterpart. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|