Academic segregation and the institutional success frame: unequal schooling and racial disparity in an integrated, affluent community.

In 1954, the US Supreme Court ruled that a system of ‘separate but equal’ schools for Blacks and Whites was ‘inherently unequal’, thus ending de jure segregation in American schools. Racial segregation, however, persists in American schools. While researchers have linked the continued segregation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies Vol. 43; no. 14; pp. 2423 - 2440
Autor principal: Drake, Sean
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125583450&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 125583450
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1369183X
        56F
      jtl: Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies
      issn: 1369183X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2017
      vid: 43
      iid: 14
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        125583450
        10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315868
      ppf: 2423
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Academic segregation and the institutional success frame: unequal schooling and racial disparity in an integrated, affluent community.
      aug:
        au: Drake, Sean
        affil: Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
      su:
        Discrimination in education
        Race discrimination
        Schools
        School environment
        Class differences
        Social reproduction
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Discrimination in education
          Race discrimination
          Schools
          School environment
          Class differences
          Social reproduction
      keyword:
        Academic segregation
        Asian achievement
        ethnoracial inequality
        institutional success frame
        social reproduction
      ab: In 1954, the US Supreme Court ruled that a system of ‘separate but equal’ schools for Blacks and Whites was ‘inherently unequal’, thus ending de jure segregation in American schools. Racial segregation, however, persists in American schools. While researchers have linked the continued segregation of schools to the racial and class segregation of neighbourhoods, school segregation also exists within neighbourhoods and independent of residential segregation. Drawing on two years of fieldwork at two dissimilar high schools, I unveil an unforgiving institutional culture and process of school segregation in an affluent, racially diverse Southern California suburb. A nationally ranked, elite comprehensive high school, where enrolment is predominantly Asian, White, and affluent, supports an exacting institutional success frame. Students who fall short of meeting this frame are subject to academic segregation; they are jettisoned to a separate and unequal high school where the enrolment is disproportionately Black, Latino, and working-class. Korean American and Chinese American parents and students inspire the unyielding institutional success frame, and the frame results in academic segregation. Academic segregation reproduces ethnoracial and socioeconomic inequality in an integrated, affluent community, and the institutional success frame provides a rationale for institutional actors to legitimise and justify the inequality.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N