The Pragmatics of Slurs.

I argue that the offense generation pattern of slurring terms parallels that of impoliteness behaviors, and is best explained by appeal to similar purely pragmatic mechanisms. In choosing to use a slurring term rather than its neutral counterpart, the speaker signals that she endorses the term (and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nous (0029-4624) Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 439 - 463
Autor principal: Bolinger, Renée Jorgensen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125707357&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 125707357
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00294624
        D97
      jtl: Nous (0029-4624)
      issn: 00294624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2017
      vid: 51
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        125707357
        10.1111/nous.12090
      ppf: 439
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 580KB
      tig:
        atl: The Pragmatics of Slurs.
      aug:
        au: Bolinger, Renée Jorgensen
        affil: University of Southern California
      su:
        Discriminatory language
        Pragmatics
        Offensive behavior
        Psycholinguistics
        Language & languages
      sug:
        subj:
          Discriminatory language
          Pragmatics
          Offensive behavior
          Psycholinguistics
          Language & languages
      ab: I argue that the offense generation pattern of slurring terms parallels that of impoliteness behaviors, and is best explained by appeal to similar purely pragmatic mechanisms. In choosing to use a slurring term rather than its neutral counterpart, the speaker signals that she endorses the term (and its associations). Such an endorsement warrants offense, and consequently slurs generate offense whenever a speaker's use demonstrates a contrastive preference for the slurring term. Since this explanation comes at low theoretical cost and imposes few constraints on an account of the semantics of slurs, this suggests that we should not require semantic accounts to provide an independent explanation of the offense profile.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Nous (0029-4624) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Nous (0029-4624)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N