On the Subject Matter of the Concept of Revolution.

This article disputes the possibility and reason for any general theory of revolution (philosophical or metahistorical) that claims to reveal the “essence” of this phenomenon without regard for the context in which any particular revolution occurs. The article describes revolutions as contingent and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Russian Studies in Philosophy Vol. 55; no. 3/4; pp. 265 - 280
Autor principal: Kapustin, Boris G.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125723865&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 125723865
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10611967
        2CQ
      jtl: Russian Studies in Philosophy
      issn: 10611967
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2017
      vid: 55
      iid: 3/4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        125723865
        10.1080/10611967.2017.1370303
      ppf: 265
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 148KB
      tig:
        atl: On the Subject Matter of the Concept of Revolution.
      aug:
        au: Kapustin, Boris G.
      su:
        Philosophy of revolutions
        Revolutions
        Abstract art
        Modern art
        Freedom & art
        Modernity
        Causation (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophy of revolutions
          Revolutions
          Abstract art
          Modern art
          Freedom & art
          Modernity
          Causation (Philosophy)
      keyword:
        causation through freedom
        event
        event subject
        ontology of the unpredictability of revolutions
        revolution
      ab: This article disputes the possibility and reason for any general theory of revolution (philosophical or metahistorical) that claims to reveal the “essence” of this phenomenon without regard for the context in which any particular revolution occurs. The article describes revolutions as contingent and self-constituting events. Their triggers, but not their causes, are the dysfunctions of existing orders (the incompleteness of the structuredness of these orders). Such events are a special kind of historical and political practice and are characterized primarily as the initiation of a mechanism that Kant called causation through freedom, and the emergence of collective actors possessing the properties of a political subject (as strictly an event, not metaphysical subject). Such events are possible only in the context of Modernity, just as Modernity itself persists until and to the extent that it bears the imprint of these events, both in its institutional organization and in its historical memory (as a belief in the feasibility of an alternative to existing structures of domination, and not as an homage to the “museum of revolution,” which fixes it in a “glorious” but lifeless past).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Russian Studies in Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Russian Studies in Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N