The ‘illegal sentences which magistrates were daily passing’: The Backstory to Governor Richard Bourke's 1832 Punishment and Summary Jurisdiction Act in Convict New South Wales.

Recent literature has recast the history of the British empire as a vast project of intervention in and reordering of colonial legal administrations. Closer inspection of local moments of legal reform, however, reveals substantial complications and contradictions in that project. This article re-con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Legal History Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 231 - 254
Main Author: Roberts, David Andrew
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2017
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125811322&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 125811322
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01440365
        7JG
      jtl: Journal of Legal History
      issn: 01440365
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2017
      vid: 38
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        125811322
        10.1080/01440365.2017.1387996
      ppf: 231
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: The ‘illegal sentences which magistrates were daily passing’: The Backstory to Governor Richard Bourke's 1832 Punishment and Summary Jurisdiction Act in Convict New South Wales.
      aug:
        au: Roberts, David Andrew
        affil: School of Humanities, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
      su:
        Bourke, Richard
        Criminal sentencing
        Jurisdiction
        Punishment -- History
        Law reform
        History of New South Wales
        Illegality
        Prisoners -- History
        Nineteenth century
        History
        Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Australia
          Bourke, Richard
          Criminal sentencing
          Jurisdiction
          Punishment -- History
          Law reform
          History of New South Wales
          Illegality
          Prisoners -- History
          Nineteenth century
          History
      ab: Recent literature has recast the history of the British empire as a vast project of intervention in and reordering of colonial legal administrations. Closer inspection of local moments of legal reform, however, reveals substantial complications and contradictions in that project. This article re-considers Governor Richard Bourke's Punishment and Summary Jurisdiction Act 1832, the most celebrated legal intervention in the history of the ‘convict colony’ of New South Wales by a governor whose liberalism and humanitarianism epitomized the spirit of imperial reform agendas. The nature and objectives of Bourke's so-called Fifty Lashes Act are widely misunderstood. This article shows that while Bourke positioned his Act as a matter of legal urgency, its core aim was to render convict punishment more useful and economical. Moreover, Bourke's reforms were less innovative than is commonly assumed, being mostly required to re-assert and refine existing law that was being disregarded. Nevertheless, Bourke's reforms did address long-contested legal issues surrounding the summary jurisdiction of colonial magistrates and the local application of English transportation law. The backstory to the Act reveals the remarkably complicated and truly disordered state of the law in New South Wales, but this article also shows how the implementation of legal reform was seasoned with confusion and caution.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Legal History is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Legal History
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N