Parthood and naturalness.

Is part of a perfectly natural, or fundamental, relation? Philosophers have been hesitant to take a stand on this issue. One reason for this hesitancy is the worry that, if parthood is perfectly natural, then the perfectly natural properties and relations are not suitably 'independent' of one anothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 174; no. 12; pp. 3163 - 3181
Autor principal: Eddon, M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=125839962&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 125839962
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2017
      vid: 174
      iid: 12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        125839962
        10.1007/s11098-016-0852-7
      ppf: 3163
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 746KB
      tig:
        atl: Parthood and naturalness.
      aug:
        au: Eddon, M.
        affil: University of Massachusetts-Amherst , Amherst USA
      su:
        Naturalness (Linguistics)
        Philosophers
        Lewis, David B., 1945-
        Physics
        Isomorphism (Mathematics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Naturalness (Linguistics)
          Philosophers
          Lewis, David B., 1945-
          Physics
          Isomorphism (Mathematics)
      keyword:
        Fundamental
        Mereology
        Natural
        Parthood
      ab: Is part of a perfectly natural, or fundamental, relation? Philosophers have been hesitant to take a stand on this issue. One reason for this hesitancy is the worry that, if parthood is perfectly natural, then the perfectly natural properties and relations are not suitably 'independent' of one another. (Roughly, the perfectly natural properties are not suitably independent if there are necessary connections among them.) In this paper, I argue that parthood is a perfectly natural relation. In so doing, I argue that this 'independence' worry is unfounded. I conclude by noting some consequences of the naturalness of parthood.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2017. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N