The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model.
According to the common-sense model of self-regulation, individuals form lay representations of illnesses that guide coping procedures to manage illness threat. We meta-analyzed studies adopting the model to (a) examine the intercorrelations among illness representation dimensions, coping strategies...
| Publicado en: | Psychological Bulletin Vol. 143; no. 11; pp. 1117 - 1155 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Nov2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=125973230&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 125973230 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00332909 PSB jtl: Psychological Bulletin issn: 00332909 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2017 vid: 143 iid: 11 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 125973230 10.1037/bul0000118 ppf: 1117 ppct: 38 formats: tig: atl: The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model. aug: au: Hagger, Martin S. Koch, Severine Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D. Orbell, Sheina affil: Curtin University and University of Jyväskylä Curtin University University of Essex su: Common sense Psychological adaptation Chronic diseases Chronic diseases & psychology Self regulation Management sug: subj: Common sense Psychological adaptation Chronic diseases Chronic diseases & psychology Self regulation Management keyword: chronic illness coping procedures illness cognition illness perceptions parallel-processing model chronic illness coping procedures illness cognition illness perceptions parallel-processing model ab: According to the common-sense model of self-regulation, individuals form lay representations of illnesses that guide coping procedures to manage illness threat. We meta-analyzed studies adopting the model to (a) examine the intercorrelations among illness representation dimensions, coping strategies, and illness outcomes; (b) test the sufficiency of a process model in which relations between illness representations and outcomes were mediated by coping strategies; and (c) test effects of moderators on model relations. Studies adopting the common-sense model in chronic illness (k = 254) were subjected to random-effects meta-analysis. The pattern of zero-order corrected correlations among illness representation dimensions (identity, consequences, timeline, perceived control, illness coherence, emotional representations), coping strategies (avoidance, cognitive reappraisal, emotion venting, problem-focused generic, problem-focused specific, seeking social support), and illness outcomes (disease state, distress, well-being, physical, role, and social functioning) was consistent with previous analyses. Meta-analytic path analyses supported a process model that included direct effects of illness representations on outcomes and indirect effects mediated by coping. Emotional representations and perceived control were consistently related to illness-related and functional outcomes via, respectively, lower and greater employment of coping strategies to deal with symptoms or manage treatment. Representations signaling threat (consequences, identity) had specific positive and negative indirect effects on outcomes through problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies. There was little evidence of moderation of model effects by study design, illness type and context, and study quality. A revised process model is proposed to guide future research which includes effects of moderators, individual differences, and beliefs about coping and treatment. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|