Imagen de Portada
Código QR

DESCARTES'O AR RYLE'O MITAS?

In this paper, we treat Ryle's The Concept of Mind as a polemical work. The main question is as follows. On what grounds does Ryle associate "an intellectual tendency" he criticizes with historical Descartes? We defend the following thesis: "the Myth of Descartes" is a rhetorical construction that d...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 92; pp. 90 - 102
Autor principal: Saulius, Tomas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=126047956&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 126047956
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2017
      vid: 92
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        126047956
        10.15388/Problemos.2017.92.10903
      ppf: 90
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.1MB
      tig:
        atl: DESCARTES'O AR RYLE'O MITAS?
      aug:
        au: Saulius, Tomas
        affil: Lietuvos sporto universiteto Sveikatos, fizinio ir socialinio ugdymo katedra Sporto g. 6, LT-44221 Kaunas
      sug:
      keyword:
        Descartes
        dualism
        Gilbert Ryle
        mind
        Descartes'as
        dualizmas
        Gilbertas Ryle'as
        sąmonė
      ab:
        In this paper, we treat Ryle's The Concept of Mind as a polemical work. The main question is as follows. On what grounds does Ryle associate "an intellectual tendency" he criticizes with historical Descartes? We defend the following thesis: "the Myth of Descartes" is a rhetorical construction that does not reflect the main aspects of Descartes' dualism. Two conclusions are drawn. First, without providing clear criteria for analysis, Ryle tries to give his work a systematic character through rhetorical means. Secondly, the contrasts between Meditations and "the Myth of Descartes" reveal that Ryle fails to give due reflection to his relationship with the philosophical tradition.
        Straipsnyje Ryle'o „Sąmonės samprata" traktuojama kaip poleminis veikalas. Keliamas klausimas, kokiu pagrindu jame kritikuojama „intelektualinė tendencija" yra siejama su istoriniu Descartes'u. Ginama tezė, kad „Descartes'o mitas" - tai retorinė konstrukcija, neatspindinti svarbių Descartes'o dualizmo aspektų. Daromos dvi išvados. Pirma, neduodamas aiškių analizės kriterijų, Ryle'as mėgina suteikti savo veikalui sistemiškumo pobūdį būtent retorinėmis priemonėmis. Antra, „Meditacijų" ir „Descartes'o mito" kontrastai atskleidžia, kad santykis su filosofine tradicija nėra Ryle'o pakankamai reflektuotas.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N