How Do We Recognise Deleuze and Simondon Are Spinozists?
While typically unapologetic in expressing admiration, notably Gilles Deleuze admits his concern one time, in passing, that Gilbert Simondon's thought might hide a pernicious kind of 'disguised moralism', in which the form of the transcendent ('God', 'Man', 'Ideas') lurks, the enemy of the philosoph...
| Publicado en: | Deleuze Studies Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 555 - 580 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Edinburgh University Press
Nov2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=126056624&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 126056624 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17502241 2Q70 jtl: Deleuze Studies issn: 17502241 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2017 vid: 11 iid: 4 pid: 2327 pub: Edinburgh University Press artinfo: ui: 126056624 10.3366/dls.2017.0285 ppf: 555 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 125KB tig: atl: How Do We Recognise Deleuze and Simondon Are Spinozists? aug: au: Scott, David su: Philosophy of education Simondon, Gilbert, 1924-1989 Transcendental Meditation Humanism Sensory perception sug: subj: Philosophy of education Simondon, Gilbert, 1924-1989 Transcendental Meditation Humanism Sensory perception keyword: Deleuze ethics humanism poststructuralism Simondon Spinoza ab: While typically unapologetic in expressing admiration, notably Gilles Deleuze admits his concern one time, in passing, that Gilbert Simondon's thought might hide a pernicious kind of 'disguised moralism', in which the form of the transcendent ('God', 'Man', 'Ideas') lurks, the enemy of the philosophy of immanence. Might there in fact be an ulterior motive in Deleuze's concern? But might this potential critique invite its own reversal? That is, might Deleuze's accusation be in fact a strategy for teasing out what, perhaps, is unrecognisable as such, but structurally essential for how Simondon constructs his onto-epistemological goals? Moreover, might this Simondonian response, unmasked, not only deflect but anticipate a 'critique' like Deleuze's? Extending this question further reveals I believe the implications for Simondon's 'ethics without morality', bringing him closer to Deleuze's interpretation of Spinoza. As a result, Deleuze's 'critique' invites the question: 'What exactly is Spinozan in Simondon's ethics?' Such a question compels our re-evaluation of humanism, its underlying prerogatives, if now in light of its consequences, the re-evaluation of poststructuralism: first, because it is predicated on the critique of the humanistic subject and, second, because 'poststructuralism' has come to designate how Simondon's relatedness is determined to Deleuze. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Deleuze Studies is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Deleuze Studies holder: Edinburgh University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|