Assessing physician knowledge regarding indications for a primary prevention implantable defibrillator and potential barriers for referral.

Background Although there is clear evidence to demonstrate that primary prevention implantable defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in high-risk patients, ICDs are underutilized. Limited data exist assessing referring physicians' knowledge about guideline indications and attitudes towards ICDs, wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 28; no. 11; pp. 1334 - 1342
Autores principales: Bernier, Rochelle, Raj, Satish R., Tran, Dat, Reyes, Lucy, Sauve, Michel, Sumner, Glen L., Exner, Derek V., Sandhu, Roopinder K.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=126202019&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 126202019
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2017
      vid: 28
      iid: 11
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        126202019
        126202019
        126202019
        10.1111/jce.13326
        126202019
      ppf: 1334
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Assessing physician knowledge regarding indications for a primary prevention implantable defibrillator and potential barriers for referral.
      aug:
        au:
          Bernier, Rochelle
          Raj, Satish R.
          Tran, Dat
          Reyes, Lucy
          Sauve, Michel
          Sumner, Glen L.
          Exner, Derek V.
          Sandhu, Roopinder K.
        affil: Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Alberta Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Electrophysiology
          Defibrillators, Implantable
          Quality Assurance
          Death, Sudden, Cardiac
          Physician Attitudes
          Knowledge Evaluation
          Human
          Referral and Consultation
          Health Services Accessibility
          Surveys
      ab: Background Although there is clear evidence to demonstrate that primary prevention implantable defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in high-risk patients, ICDs are underutilized. Limited data exist assessing referring physicians' knowledge about guideline indications and attitudes towards ICDs, which may influence decision for referral. Methods and results The Arrhythmia Working Group from the Alberta Cardiovascular and Stroke Strategic Clinical Network developed a web-based survey consisting of case scenarios regarding primary prevention ICD indications and a list of barriers for referral to aid in the design of a complex device care pathway. We invited referring physicians to participate in the survey including internists and cardiologists and cardiology residents. The survey was completed by 109 of 799 (response rate = 14%) of physicians. Of those, 55% were internists, 32% cardiologists, and 13% cardiology residents. The majority of physicians were male (62%), practicing in a university hospital (66%). Overall, complete guideline-concordant answers were provided by 34% of physicians. In multivariable analysis, predictors of complete guideline concordance were being a cardiologist (odd ratio [OR] 5.9, confidence interval [CI] 2.1-16.4, P = 0.001) and cardiology resident (OR 6.7, CI 1.7-27.3, P = 0.007). The most common barrier for referral for internists was lack of confidence in knowledge of guideline recommendations; while cardiologists reported concerns about cost-effectiveness and cardiology residents were most concerned with inappropriate shocks. Conclusion Knowledge regarding indications for primary prevention ICD is limited and varies significantly among referring physicians. The barriers for referral differ among physician groups and addressing these identified barriers may help to improve appropriate ICD utilization.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N