Validity and reliability of wheelchair sitting posture measures using Coach’s Eye in abled subjects.
People in wheelchairs spend a long time in the sitting position and often incur alignment problems resulting in neck and back pain. This study: (1) assessed the validity/reliability of Coach’s Eye (CE) smart device application, (2) examined the effect of seat to back support angle adjustments on hea...
| Published in: | Assistive Technology Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 210 - 217 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | research Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Winter2017
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=126433963&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 126433963 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10400435 YVP jtl: Assistive Technology issn: 10400435 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Winter2017 vid: 29 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 126433963 126433963 126433963 10.1080/10400435.2016.1220994 126433963 ppf: 210 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Validity and reliability of wheelchair sitting posture measures using Coach’s Eye in abled subjects. aug: au: Alkhateeb, Afnan M. Forrester, Bonnie J. Daher, Noha S. Martin, Bradford D. Alonazi, Asma A. affil: Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA sug: subj: Wheelchairs ab: People in wheelchairs spend a long time in the sitting position and often incur alignment problems resulting in neck and back pain. This study: (1) assessed the validity/reliability of Coach’s Eye (CE) smart device application, (2) examined the effect of seat to back support angle adjustments on head, neck, and shoulder posture in the sitting position, and (3) compared changes in cervical rotation at each back support angle. Abled subjects sat in a wheelchair with back support angles positioned at 90°, 100°, and 110°. CE, as well as ImageJ software, was used to analyze three angles: sagittal head angle (SHA), cervical angle (CVA), and shoulder angle (SA). There were highly significant differences for CVA and SA (p < 0.001) among the three seat to back support angles. Validity of CE was examined by correlating CE with ImageJ scores. CE had high validity for all angles (r = 0.99, 0.98, 0.99 respectively,p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability for SHA, CVA, and SA was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ranged from 0.95 to 0.99). Head (CVA) and shoulder (SA) alignment was closest to neutral posture with back support angles set at 110° and 90°, respectively. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|