Safer by Design and Trump Rights of Citizens.
The debate on 'safer by design' has primarily been focused on strategies to render products safer during the design process. This article focuses on correlated basic legal rights of citizens. The reference to 'trump rights' is helpful in highlighting two normative claims: Firstly, products that are...
| Publicado en: | NanoEthics Vol. 11; no. 3; pp. 291 - 296 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=126529285&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 126529285 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18714757 46ON jtl: NanoEthics issn: 18714757 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2017 vid: 11 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 126529285 10.1007/s11569-017-0308-3 ppf: 291 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 362KB tig: atl: Safer by Design and Trump Rights of Citizens. aug: au: Kallhoff, Angela affil: Fakultät für Philosophie und Bildungswissenschaft der Universität Wien , NIG, 3.Stock, A0306, Universitätsstr 7 1010 Wien Austria su: Legal status of citizens Human rights Environmental ethics sug: subj: Legal status of citizens Human rights Environmental ethics keyword: Precaution Privacy by design Safer by design Trump right ab: The debate on 'safer by design' has primarily been focused on strategies to render products safer during the design process. This article focuses on correlated basic legal rights of citizens. The reference to 'trump rights' is helpful in highlighting two normative claims: Firstly, products that are 'safer by design' are suitable instruments to protect the bodily integrity and health of potential users. Both figure as trump rights in Ronald Dworkin's sense. In this perspective, 'safer by design' strategies can guarantee some most basic rights of citizens. Secondly, the debate on trump rights also suggests that safety needs to be regarded as part of a more comprehensive normative framework. Even trump rights are competitive in that a plurality of rights needs to be respected. A final section gives evidence that both claims resonate with recent insights in debate on the precautionary principle. This section also highlights the recent emphasis on environmental concerns. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: NanoEthics is a copyright of Springer, 2017. All Rights Reserved. item: NanoEthics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|