A case series comparison of semantically focused vs. phonologically focused cued naming treatment in aphasia.
There is a lack of clarity in the field regarding how to best predict which naming treatment will be most beneficial for a particular individual with aphasia. The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether or not semantic or phonological therapy differentially impacts on outcomes for people with...
| Publicado en: | Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 1 - 28 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | case study research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=126729797&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 126729797 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699206 B6X jtl: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics issn: 02699206 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 32 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 126729797 126729797 126729797 10.1080/02699206.2017.1326166 126729797 ppf: 1 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A case series comparison of semantically focused vs. phonologically focused cued naming treatment in aphasia. aug: au: Neumann, Yael affil: Department of Linguistics and Communication Disorders, Queens College, City University of New York, Queens, NY, USA sug: subj: Semantics Phonology Cues Aphasia Rehabilitation Language Therapy Human Comparative Studies Male Female Educational Status Right-Handedness Self Report Descriptive Statistics Middle Age Language Tests Adult New York Anomia Classification Prospective Studies Random Assignment P-Value Effect Size Treatment Outcomes Case Studies Middle Aged: 45-64 years Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: There is a lack of clarity in the field regarding how to best predict which naming treatment will be most beneficial for a particular individual with aphasia. The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether or not semantic or phonological therapy differentially impacts on outcomes for people with a range of different aphasic profiles when given both therapies. A single-participant design, with multiple repeated baselines for naming, replicated across four participants, was used. Participants were provided with a counterbalanced order of Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) and Phonological Components Analysis (PCA) treatment. Findings demonstrated differential effects across participants. This seemed to be influenced by factors such as severity of anomia, order of treatment presentation, and capacity limits. Clinical implications of these findings highlight the importance of expanding our picture of a participant’s behaviours to consider what other important factors can inform intervention decisions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: case study research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|